High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Dev Kumar Prasad Yadav @ Deo Kumar … vs State Of Bihar on 25 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Dev Kumar Prasad Yadav @ Deo Kumar … vs State Of Bihar on 25 August, 2010
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                              Cr.Misc. No.25925 of 2010

                 1. DEV KUMAR PRASAD YADAV @ DEO KUMAR YADAV S/O
                    BHAGAT RAI, R/O VILLAGE-KANUNIA, P.S. ADAPUR,
                    DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN.
                 2. JAI RAI S/O RAMDHARI RAI, R/O VILLAGE-KATKENWA,
                    P.S. ADAPUR, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN.
                 3. RAM SARAN PRASAD YADAV, S/O LATE RAM AWTAR
                    YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-KATKENWA, P.S. ADAPUR,
                    DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN.
                                                --PETITIONER

                                           Versus

                  THE STATE OF BIHAR                      --OPP.PARTY

2   25.08.2010

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

All the three petitioners are named accused in

this case. Petitioners no.1 and 3 carry specific allegation that

at the dictate of Parmila Devi and Bhagwat Rai, non-

petitioners, shot at Sri Niwas Patel and Alok Paswan but the

injury reports of the above two are contrary to the allegations

leveled. Petitioner no.2 carries no specific allegation.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the

three petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender

within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on

bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul
2

at Motihari, in Adapur P.S. Case no. 80 of 2009, subject to

the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the

petitioners shall remain present on each and every date

before the court below at least for one year or till disposal of

the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain

present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable

explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be

cancelled.

(Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

AAhmad