High Court Karnataka High Court

Devaraja M vs Tumkur University on 26 October, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Devaraja M vs Tumkur University on 26 October, 2010
Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And A.S.Bopanna
THEM TO CONTINUE WITH THE PRESENT SET UP OF 34
STUDENTS IN EACH DISCIPLINE BASED ON)' "THE
DECISION TAKEN BY THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL ..AN.1_"_')~--._T'HE
SYNDICATE AS PER ANEX--A & B AND DIRECT_'"f['HEA
RESPONDENTS TO STRICTLY ADHERE wITH11THE'NO-RNIS 

SET UP BY THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSTONI TO _
ENABLE IT TO GET UNIVERSITY HCRANTS””CO’MMISSION ”

ACCREDITATION AND FUNDS. ” ._ s 7
THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR ‘pRE=L1MINARY~

THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE TH’Ev.FOLLO’\KfIf»If};V
ORDE§_V’V:v
J.S.KHEHAR. C.J. (main %
Learned counsel fO7T:_Vtl’§feV»jaetiti’OTi.¢r”_1-states, that Certain
technical defeCi’sL_’exist in-:.V~th’eé:’iIistamnti petition. He further
States, that the Come to his notice.
AccOrding1yI,””‘hC- “‘fO’r~.AVvi7vithd_”favKIa1 Of the instant Writ
petition with 1iberty_ tO,”fi1e’3 f1feshV..petitiOn on the same cause of
action after removin U?!€Wtl3ChI1iC31 defects, as also after

adding méIterialV particulars.

The writ petition is dismissed as

t””–~Withdra\;I.I4D as aforementioned.

Sd/-

Chief Justice

akc / * ‘
index: Y/N Jfidge