High Court Kerala High Court

Devarajan.M.S vs The Thiruvananthapuram District on 6 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
Devarajan.M.S vs The Thiruvananthapuram District on 6 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 29060 of 2008(H)


1. DEVARAJAN.M.S.
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.SUDHEER

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :06/10/2008

 O R D E R
         Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.
        ==================================
            W.P.(C)No. 29060 of 2008-H
        ==================================
      Dated this the 6th day of October, 2008.


                     JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges proceedings under the

SARFAESI Act. The transaction is admitted. The

outstandings are not disputed. The total accruals

have to be paid. Even going by the grounds raised,

the petitioner confines the request to be one for

an opportunity to pay the outstandings in

instalments. The learned counsel for the petitioner

also states that all other contentions in

opposition to the impugned proceedings are given up

by the petitioner and he also waives his right, if

any, to move the DRT or any authority challenging

the impugned proceedings. Recording those

submissions and taking into consideration the

entire outstandings, this writ petition is ordered

directing that if the petitioner deposits an amount

of Rs.1.5 lakhs on or before the 31-10-2008 and

WPC29060/08

-:2:-

continues to deposit the entire remaining portion,

including accruals, in six equal monthly

instalments, payable on or before the 25th of every

month commencing from November, 2008, the impugned

distress action will be deferred and ultimately

dropped. If there is default in depositing any of

the instalments as aforesaid, the benefits of this

judgment will stand recalled and the writ petition

will stand dismissed enabling the respondent to

forthwith proceed with further distress action

without further notice to the petitioner.

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,
Judge.

sl.