High Court Karnataka High Court

Dhanraj vs State Of Karnataka on 16 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Dhanraj vs State Of Karnataka on 16 March, 2009
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala


This petittinn coming on for orders

Courtmade thaefollowing: _ 4

GEEK I

The pethianer-A»2 in

ofthc Sessions Judge. ,.L’5istrict,
Bangalore in before n 439
C.r.P.C. V’ uncle:

I aubm1tn’ that

I-Hurt LUUKI U!” IKAKNAIAIMH t-nun L.!J!..JKl ur nnunnannn v-nun LUURI ur zu-\mwm.u-m.u r-nun -…u-nu vr mauwu-unm-\ ruun LUUKI Ur ISAKNAIAKA HIGH 4

the police hauetaaéstcd a ,1 thus petixiormr
“m. fiom the present petitioner
alleged afieame.

: 3, Pmeadear submim that no
” fiumfimprmentpefitbnm.

counsel far tln-; pefitinner submm that

M5

m% booked a cam for an afiw

L\_W_,

§~;mmzab1e under SW ’11 379 of 129:: in

I

L

W SH COUR1 0? KARNAIAKA HIGH §;Z0gJR1 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA MIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH coma OF KARNATAKA HIGH <

Cr.Hc.324l2006. When the pctixizzrxezr was V
present petitioner 'm Cr.No.160;i«30{)6"V

Police Station.

5. As there is of the
was. T1»-.% petition.

allowed. The trial
Court Petitioner on bail subject
to oanditiona:

peflfinnar shall execute pemonal band

3 with we aunties for like
~~ thesafiskctinnoftlwirialcaun.

A. s The petitierzwr ahafi not tamper with the

pa-o%!:iun wi11$as 01′ .

{iii} The petifionsara shall mt have the
of the Sessilns Judge, Bungalow

LWA