High Court Karnataka High Court

Dhashetty vs Ravikumar on 16 February, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Dhashetty vs Ravikumar on 16 February, 2010
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
AND

2. 1BRANC'Ii::"£w£A§~iAG:ER

  BIDAR. "  ~~
    '' 'S_IvT_ BHARTI KHANDRE

   BEFERBAN BAGH

IN THE HIGH COURT OE KARNATAKA,
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA 
DATED THIS THE 16'1"" DAY OF FEBRUARY 
BEFORE « _ if I
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE HULUVADI G. "  ~  H

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAI:§IN'(),;i67S3.}'/"_I'?IO0'F h  
BETWEEN: A   t 

DHANSHETTY .
S /O BHIMSHETTY SIRSB
AGED ABOUT 26 YRS ._     
OCC SERIVE AND..MEDICAL PRAC'1'1TIO'NER. '- '
R/O KONGANKOTIQXTQ B: DIST :.BII')'_A._.R.' 

".APPELLANT

{BY SRI. SANJ,EI:V:jI:UiirIAR'CRATIL;5ABVOCATE)

1. RAVIKUMAR' _ ._  --  I
S/O MALLINATR KORE, ' 
OCC BBSINESS. ' ' '-
 . «R/OV~'H,NVO'A 09 3'*z*--I.,,SHIVNAOAR COLONY

 BIDAR.  '*

NATIONAL INSIARANCE CO., LTD
V GIR1-.§,'OM~PL_EX. OANDBIOUNJ ROAD
-- BASAVEZSHWAR CHOWK

NO "I44 1~874~E NAI BASTI



Ix)

HYDERABAD (AP)
... RESPONDENTS

(BY SR1. BABURAO Es1RADAR. ADVOCATE 1s’Or§’..1£'<..:",—"js.§ii.

SANJAY M JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & SR1.

ADVOCATE FOR R3}

MFA IHLED U/SJ73HJ CH? wn( ACf12x§nNsT gig:
LHHXMMENT & Amwuu) DATED 26/snnmw PASSED IN NfiK},
NO244/03 ON THE FILE OF THE;’PR{ES1DINC} OF3″?IC’ER_. MAC’r,

FAST TRACK COURT-IV, BIDAR.-.,_D1sM1ss1N’o._ ‘THE “CLAIM
PETETION FOR COMPENSATION. _ ._

This Miscellaneous A on for
admission this day, the Couri:’ldeliv_e1}eAd the_f,o1loWing:–

IJUDOMENTV

The appellant ‘re.presented’*lby’V _R–.:S.B__harshetty, learned

Counsel who is no more. “”Ho\5Vléi.reI”.vanothger Counsel Prasanna

Kumar M.K.:jis islrlepresented through Sri.

Sanjeev Kuma’r__Pa.til§ V ‘

2. Heard tthevvlelarnevdzoounsel for the appellant and

Caounvsel re}3re_sen_ting the…insurer viz… the 2″‘? respondent.

the claimant gave exaggerated evidence. In the

circumstarices, the proper application of mind is requ.ii'”e–d to

arrive at a just conclusion. When the injury suffere_d.V}§3i:4″theV.

claimant is said to have not been disputed _ V’

other aspects there appears to be I~i.¢x,i’c’é,__

pass the following :

 QRDfiRas
i] The appeal is alldifired   
ii} The     the claim
   is set aside.
iii)  to the MACT,
 fer' the same in accordance
:. with "    providing sufficient

Aiiopiportnnityé Vtdhoth the parties.