IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14871 of 2005
Indradeo Prasad
Versus
Uco Bank & Ors
----------------------------------
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14398 of 2005
Dhirendra Nath Jha
Versus
Uco Bank & Ors
———————————-
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14806 of 2005
Anirudh Mishra
Versus
The Uco Bank & Ors
———————————-
07. 08.11.2011 Mr. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners and
Mr. R.P. Birnaway, learned counsel for the respondent- UCO
Bank are present.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank states
that the Bank has come out with a scheme providing the same
benefit as was granted under the earlier circular dated
27.05.1994. It is contended that petitioners have already filed
their applications under the scheme which has been
introduced in the year 2010. It is also contended on behalf of
the respondent-Bank that in view of the aforesaid fact the
present application has, in fact, become infructuous.
Mr. Gupta, learned counsel states that he has not
been instructed by the petitioners in this regard. It is
contended that relevant facts in this regard are also not on
record by way of counter affidavit.
Post these matters after 02 weeks as zero item. In
the meanwhile, Mr. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners
2
will seek instruction from his clients. Mr. Birnaway, learned
counsel for the Bank shall endeavour to file relevant papers
on affidavit.
Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)