IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.misc. No.4252 of 2011
DUBAR MUKHIYA, SON OF PARAO MUKHIYA, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE-PURSHOTTAMPUR, P.S.-NAUHATTA, DISTRICT-
SAHARSA. .........PETITIONER.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF BIHAR ...........OPPOSITE PARTY.
WITH
CR.MISC. NO.2112 OF 2011
DILIP SADA @ DILIP SADA (MUKHIYA), SON OF BASUDEO
SADA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-DUMRA, POLICE STATION-
NAUHATTA, DISTRICT-SAHARSA. .........PETITIONER.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF BIHAR ...........OPPOSITE PARTY.
-----------
2 19.02.2011 Perused the record.
The petitioners are apprehending
their arrest in a case registered under
Section 25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
There was allegation of assault
against Naresh Kumar Verma on 14.11.2008 for
which a substantive case was lodged against
Naresh Kumar Verma and Ashok Kumar Verma. In
the F.I.R. it was allged that from Naresh
Kumar Verma villagers snatched the country
made gun, but for the said occurrence, it is
shocking that after two years, on the
direction of the S.P., the present case has
been lodged against the persons who snatched
the gun from the assailant.
The pleading of the petitioner
appears to be convincing that in order to
2
save the main accused this frivolous case
has been lodged. Under the criminal
procedure code there was no occasion for
lodging a separate case, rather if the
materials came anybody could had been made
accused in the earlier case. Let the matter
be verified by the I.G. of the Saharsa
range.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let
the petitioners above named be released on
anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or
surrender before the court below within a
period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing
bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saharsa in
connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case no.63 of
2010.
PN ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)