Dinesan vs V.A.Xavier on 27 January, 2011

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RP.No. 22 of 2011(M)


1. DINESAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. V.A.XAVIER, S/O. V.J.ANTONY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. CORPORATION OF COCHIN, REP. BY

3. THE SECRETARY,

4. V.RAJU,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :27/01/2011

 O R D E R
                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

            ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                        R.P. No. 22 of 2011
                                      in
                W.P.(C) No. 20079 of 2006 M
            ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````
          Dated this the 27th day of January, 2011

                                O R D E R

Heard.

2. This Review Petition is filed by the additional fourth

respondent in the writ petition. A reading of paragraphs 10

and 11 of the judgment shows why this Court accepted the

contention against the review petitioner and imposed cost on

him. The grounds raised in the Review Petition do not

suggest that the aforesaid findings in the judgment are vitiated

for any reason.

Therefore, the Review Petition is only to be dismissed

and I do so.

Sd/-

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
aks

// True Copy //

P.A. To Judge