High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Dinesh Kewat vs The State Of Bihar on 8 November, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Dinesh Kewat vs The State Of Bihar on 8 November, 2011
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.36649 of 2011
                 Dinesh Kewat, Son of Sri Keshar Kewat, resident of Village-Ramhari Pind,
                 P.S.-Rajgir, District-Nalanda.                      ........Petitioner.
                                           Versus
                 The State of Bihar                          .................Opp. Party.
                                          -----------

2 08.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence

under Sections 143, 149, 323, 307, 379, 427, 504 and 302 of the

Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted that there is no specific over act alleged

against the petitioner. Another co-accused whose case is similarly

situated to that of the petitioner namely Ram Pravesh Kewat has

already been granted bail by order dated 29.9.2011 passed in Cr.

Misc. No. 32334 of 2011.

Considering the aforesaid submissions and facts and

circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to

be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at

Biharsharif in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 91 of 2011

subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be

a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other

shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to

inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the
2

petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will

inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other

case of similar nature after his release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding

for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police

papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if

he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.

(iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

Sanjeet/                                    (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)