Allahabad High Court High Court

Dinesh Kumar Kaushik vs State Of U.P. And Others on 27 January, 2010

Allahabad High Court
Dinesh Kumar Kaushik vs State Of U.P. And Others on 27 January, 2010
Court No. - 54

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2203 of 2010

Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Kaushik
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- R.P. Mishra
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
This   application   has   been   filed   by   the   applicant   Dinesh   Kumar 
Kaushik   against   the   order   dated   12.1.2010   passed   by   C.J.M. 
Bulandshahr in case No. 1156 of 2009 whereby the application filed 
under   section   156(3)   Cr.P.C.   has   been   allowed   and   the   Officer 
Incharge of the police station concerned has been directed to register 
the case and investigate the same in exercise of powers conferred 
under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. 

It   is   contended   by   the   learned   counsel   for   the   applicant   that   the 
impugned order is illegal, it has not been passed in accordance with 
the provisions of law.

It has been rebutted by the learned A.G.A. by submitting that there is 
no   illegality   in   the   impugned   order   because   on   the   basis   of   the 
allegations made in the application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. a 
prima facie cognizable offence is made out and the allegations are of 
such nature which requires investigation. There is no illegality in the 
impugned order.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the 
applicant   and   the   learned   A.G.A.   and   from   the   perusal   of   the 
application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C., it appears that on the basis 
of the allegation made therein a prima facie cognizable offence is 
made out and the allegations are of such a nature which requires 
investigation, the impugned order is not suffering from any illegality or 
irregularity, therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned order is 
refused.

It is further contended that the applicant is man of peace loving. He 
shall   cooperate   with   the   investigation.   In   case,   the   applicant   is 
arrested and sent to jail during investigation, the applicant shall suffer 
irreparable loss. Therefore, the applicant may not be arrested during 
investigation.

Considering   the   facts,   circumstances   of   the   case   and   the 
submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the 
learned   A.G.A,   it   is   directed   that  in   case  the   FIR   has   not   been 
registered till today, if it is lodged subsequently  in pursuance to 
the   impugned   order,   the   applicant   shall   not   be   arrested   during 
investigation of the case but the applicant shall cooperate with the 
investigation.

With this direction this application is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 27.1.2010
RPD