High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Diwakar Prasad Sinha vs The State Of Bihar on 12 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Diwakar Prasad Sinha vs The State Of Bihar on 12 September, 2011
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Criminal Miscellaneous No.26936 of 2011
                   1. Diwakar Prasad Sinha S/O Late Kamal Nayan Prasad
                      Sinha R/O Vill. Gonama Colony, Kachahari Road, P.S.
                      Barh, Distt. Patna.
                                                 Versus
                                         1. The State of Bihar
                                             -----------------

02. 12.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case

registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and

Section 130 of N.I. Act.

In the complaint the allegation against petitioner is

that he had given a cheque of Rs. 40,000/- which bounced. The

submission of the petitioner is that he is ready to pay the said

amount to the complainant in equal instalments if he is

granted bail.

Considering the said undertaking, let the petitioner,

above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of

arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a

period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by

the Court to the satisfaction of Sri Lalan Kumar, Judicial

Magistrate, 1st Class, Barh (or its successor) in connection with

Complaint Case No. 579(C) of 2010 subject to the conditions

as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That

one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who

will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related
2

with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the

Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii)

That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an

accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released

on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he

will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in

any other case of similar nature after his release in the present

case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate

the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date

and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled.

The Court below will initially release the petitioner on

provisional bail for a period of four months and if he satisfies

before the Court that the entire Rs. 40,000/- had been paid by

him, the Court below shall confirm provisional bail granted to

the petitioner on the conditions mentioned above.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-