High Court Kerala High Court

Dominic.P vs State Of Kerala Represented By … on 25 June, 2007

Kerala High Court
Dominic.P vs State Of Kerala Represented By … on 25 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 3732 of 2007()


1. DOMINIC.P, S/O GABRIYAL,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SEBASTIAN.P., S/O GABRIYAL,
3. PIYOOS.P., S/O GABRIYAL,
4. VINU.P., S/O DOMINIC, AGED 33 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY STATION
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.M.PAREETH

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :25/06/2007

 O R D E R
                                     R.BASANT, J.

                                  ----------------------

                               B.A.No.3732  of 2007

                            ----------------------------------------

                     Dated this the  25th  day of June 2007




                                       O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners are four in

number. They have allegedly committed the offence punishable inter

alia under Section 452 I.P.C. That is the only non-bailable offence

alleged against the petitioners now. In the F.I.R, there is no

allegation of commission of any non-bailable offence raised. Incident

had taken place on 30/4/2007. The crime was registered showing

non-bailable offence on 15/5/2007. Subsequently the police, after

investigation, have included the crime under Section 452 I.P.C.

Investigation is in progress. According to the petitioners, there is a

counter case also. They contend that the allegations are totally false

and raised with vexatious intent belatedly. It is prayed that

anticipatory bail may be granted to the petitioners. The learned

Public Prosecutor submits that in the facts and circumstances of this

case, prosecution does not want to oppose the application for

anticipatory bail. Appropriate conditions which shall secure the

interests of a fair, proper and expeditious investigation may be

imposed, submits the learned Public Prosecutor.

2. I am satisfied, in the facts and circumstances of this case

that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners. This petition

B.A.No.3732/07 2

is accordingly allowed. The following directions are issued under

Section 438 Cr.P.C.

i) Petitioners shall surrender before the learned Magistrate

having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 02/07/2007. They shall be released

on regular bail on condition that they execute bonds for Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties

each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.

ii) The petitioners shall make themselves available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m and 1

p.m on 03/07/2007 and thereafter as and when directed by the

investigating officer in writing to do so.

(iii) If the petitioners do not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to arrest

the petitioners and deal with them in accordance with law, as if these

directions were not issued at all.

(iv) If they were arrested prior to 02/07/2007, they shall be

released on bail on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

twenty five thousand only) without any sureties, undertaking to

appear before the learned Magistrate on 02/07/2007.






                                                              (R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr


                                     // True Copy//          PA to Judge


B.A.No.3732/07    3


B.A.No.3732/07    4


       R.BASANT, J.





         CRL.M.CNo.





            ORDER





21ST DAY OF MAY2007