High Court Kerala High Court

Dr.A.B.Usha vs State Of Kerala on 5 April, 2010

Kerala High Court
Dr.A.B.Usha vs State Of Kerala on 5 April, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 33451 of 2005(G)


1. DR.A.B.USHA, LECTURER, SELECTION GRADE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE

4. THE PRINCIPAL,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.P.SUDHAKARA PRASAD (SR.)

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :05/04/2010

 O R D E R
            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
                    -------------------------------------------
                     W.P(C).No.33451 OF 2005
                   -------------------------------------------
               Dated this the 5th day of April, 2010


                               JUDGMENT

The petitioner was placed as Selection Grade Lecturer on

21.5.1996 under the UGC scheme on her obtaining Ph.D. The

question is as to whether her entitlement to two advance

increments on account of acquiring Ph.D. Degree would be while

as a Senior Lecturer or when she moved into the Selection Grade

Lecturer’s/Reader’s post. This issue stands directly covered in

favour of the petitioner by the judgment of this Court dated

12.7.2007 in W.P(C).11630/04. Under such circumstances, the

petitioner is entitled to succeed.

Learned counsel for the Government states that a writ

appeal has been filed against the aforesaid judgment. As of now,

it is not stated that writ appeal had at least come up for

admission, though it appears that the same is filed with an

application to condone delay. I do not find any ground to differ

WPC.33451/05.

2

from following the judgment referred to above. Under such

circumstances, this writ petition is allowed quashing Exts.P6 and

P10. The respondents are directed to fix the pay of the

petitioner without reference to Exts.P4, P6 and P10 to the extent

quashed above and to release to her all pending amounts,

including by way of annual increments etc. The provisions of

Ext.P4 would be operated only in terms of the declarations of the

law contained in the judgment dated 12.7.2007 in W.P(C).

11630/04. Let the benefits due to the petitioner be released

within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment. The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
Judge.

kkb.06/04.