{N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
DATED THIS THE 31*" DAY OF AUGUST,__'Z0'i{} _
BEFORE V
THE HON'BLE MR. jUsT1cE Ivm. N:AG_A1§kiQiHAN' 'D ' T
C0.P.N¢1'89z/20{V}'§-._ A
B ETWEEN :
DR.B.S.RAVI -- V ;
N0.142, IDA PHAsE--H A
CHERLAPALLY'3,__.'-- j g
HYDERAB:AD:E-50aV_051 ~ _
..PBTITIONER
(By SI:,i;éAMP.§iTH i%APA§I?V;'_'AD'\f;)
M'/s. ALDEA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD
' ..REGDv.O1?FICE;._NO.81/2
D.IAGQN.AL ROAD,
"V.'V.PURAM,A'EI=
BA__NG_ALORE--560 004
REP..,B'¥ ITS DXRECTOR.
" RESPONDENT
Q’ ‘(‘Byu5Sri.ARAViND MNEGLUR, ADV.)
did…
Respondent — Company failed to pay the balance of principatand
interest. On 18.5.2006 as per Annexure–B, petitioner
calling upon the Respondent ~ Company to repay _the:f’amoii_nrsi.4 dtiisii
by them failing which to take appropriate legal jact.ion.’
the Respondent ~ Company made’ certain payment anelt revquiesteddto V’
adjust the same towards principai’~ interest.
Accordingly, the repaymenitimadep Company
came to be adjusted V thereafter the
Respondent; of Rs.l,00,000/–
towards. Despite repeated requests,
demands and __datedm;30.9.2005 as per Annexure~D,
the RespondentC4′-Cornp_ar1y:pVi’failed to pay the amounts due to the
petitioner. Henceyithis petition under Section 433 for winding up of
C the Responderit a Company.
~~ After service of notice, Respondent – Company
C’ , entered appearance and filed statement of objections interalia
i admitting the transaction between the parties. Respondent ~
Company contends that there is a dispute between the parties in the
d)_;-J'”‘”
V) Petitioner is further directe
of this order in English daily
days from the date receipt of copy of thiis.efder;
DKB.
d to take out advertisesriezit
‘The Hindu’ 515 ~ it