Dr.Baijnath Prasad Singh vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 10 February, 2011

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                         CWJC No.1204 of 2006
                    DR.BAIJNATH PRASAD SINGH SON OF LATE TARKESHWAR
                    PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF DR. BAIJNATH MARG, NEAR ZILA
                    SCHOOL, GAYA, P.S. CIVIL LINE GAYA, DIST. GAYA.
                                            Versus
                1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY OLD
                    SECRETARIAT, PATNA.
                2. THE COMMISSIONER, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNEMNT OF
                    BIHAR, PATNA.
                3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR,
                    PATNA.
                4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATION), BIHAR
                    PATNA.
                5. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GEENRAL OF POLICE, MAGADH RANGE,
                    GAYA.
                6. MR. CHAITANYA PRASAD, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE
                    PETITIONER THEN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA.
                7. MR. SANJAY SINGH, SON OF SRI I.P. SINGH, THEN
                    SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GAYA.
                8. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA.
                9. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GAYA.
                10. MR. SATYA NARAYAN SINGH SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE
                    PETITIONER DR. S.P. GAYA DISTRICT GAYA.
                11. MR. VIJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAV, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE
                    PETITIONER SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GAYA.
                12. MR. R.K. SHARMA SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SUB
                    INSPECTOR, KOTWALI POLICE STATION GAYA, DISTRICT GAYA.
                                                -----------

05. 10.02.2011 It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that for the relief

prayed for in the writ petition, Title Suit No.115 of 2009 has been

filed in the Court of Subordinate Judge-III, Gaya and in the said suit

order restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession

of the College over the premises in question has been passed.

In the light of the orders passed in Title Suit No.115 of

2009, prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous, which

is, accordingly, disposed of.

(V.N. Sinha, J.)
Rajesh/