IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.6324 of 2007
Dr. Chandra Bhushan
Versus
The State Of Bihar & Ors.
-----------
2 02.09.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the
parties and in view of the divergent stand
taken by the petitioner and the respondents,
this Court would now direct the petitioner to
file a specific supplementary affidavit with
documentary proof as with regard to the
payment of subsistence allowance on or after
28.1.2005 to 1.7.2006 and/or his remaining
stationed at the Headquarters at Patna during
the period of suspension, in the
aforementioned period.
It is, however, made clear that if
the petitioner had not received the
subsistence allowance after 28.1.2005 and had
also not continued to be in the headquarters
during his suspension, the natural
presumption would be that the petitioner was
fully aware of the order of revocation of his
suspension, which had also contained a clause
for reporting on duty at his earlier place of
posting.
List this case after two weeks at
the top of list.
Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)