CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market,
Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067.
Tel: +91-11-26161796
Decision No. CIC /SG/C/2009/001351/5070
Complaint No. CIC/SG/C/2008/001351
Complainant : Dr. Fazal Ul Haque
2163, Rodgaran, Lal Kuan,
Delhi-110006
Respondent : Public Information Officer
Deputy Registrar,
University of Delhi,
Main Campus, Delhi-110007
Facts
arising from the Complaint:
Mr. Fazal Ul Haque had filed a RTI application with the PIO- Asstt.
Registrar(Medical), Faculty of Medicine, University of Delhi, Delhi-110009 on
07/08/2009 asking for certain information. The PIO- Deputy Registrar, University of
Delhi has returned back the Application and the Indian Postal Order to the complainant.
The IPO and the Application was returned with a letter dated 17/08/2009 by the
PIO stating that the Complainant had filed the IPO in the name of University of Delhi and
not in the name of Registrar, University of Delhi. Aggrieved by the refusal of the PIO the
Complainant has filed a complaint before the Commission on 05/10/2009.
Decision:
Complaint Dismissed.
The Commission sees no merit in the complaint. The PIO has rightly retuned the
IPO since it was addressed to University of Delhi and not to the Accounts Officer as
mandated by Rule 3 of Right to Information (Regulation of Fees and Cost) Rules, 2005.
Rule 3 very clearly provides that:
“A request for obtaining information under subsection (1) of Section 6 shall be
accompanied by an application fee of Rs. 10/-by way of cash against proper receipt or by
demand draft or bankers cheque or Indian Postal Order payable to the Accounts officer
of the public authority”.
Therefore, the Commission sees no justification to interfere with the order of the
PIO returning the IPO of the complainant.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
07 October 2009
(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(RA)