High Court Kerala High Court

Dr.K.R.Anandapadmanabhan vs The Government Of Kerala on 6 June, 2007

Kerala High Court
Dr.K.R.Anandapadmanabhan vs The Government Of Kerala on 6 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 17260 of 2007(D)


1. DR.K.R.ANANDAPADMANABHAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REP. BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.SASIDHARAN CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :06/06/2007

 O R D E R
                              A.K.BASHEER, J.

                      --------------------------------------------

                        W.P.(C)No.17260 OF 2007

                      ---------------------------------------------

                   Dated this the 6th day of June, 2007


                                  JUDGMENT

Petitioner who is working as an Associate Professor in

the Department of General Surgery in Trivandrum Medical

College has got a grievance that his request for promotion is

not being duly considered. He asserts that two retirement

vacancies in the cadre of Professor of Surgery are available

since May 1, 2007.

2. I do not propose to deal with the above contentions

raised by the petitioner at this stage in view of the limited

prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner at the

Bar. He submits that petitioner will be satisfied, if a

direction is issued to respondent no.1 to consider and pass

orders on Ext.P4 in which petitioner has highlighted his

grievance and all the relevant aspects of the issue. Learned

Government Pleader submits that an appropriate decision on

Ext.P4 will be taken without any further delay.

W.P.(C)No.17260 OF 2007

:: 2 ::

3. In the above facts and circumstances, writ petition is

disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to consider

and pass orders on Ext.P4 strictly on its merit and in

accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,

within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. Needless to mention that respondent no.1 shall

ensure that petitioner and all other eligible candidates are

afforded sufficient opportunity to be heard before any

decision is taken in the matter. Petitioner shall produce a

copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of the

judgment before respondent no.1 for compliance.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE

jes