Central Information Commission Judgements

Dr. P. L. Lakhani vs National Assessment & … on 7 January, 2009

Central Information Commission
Dr. P. L. Lakhani vs National Assessment & … on 7 January, 2009
                        CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                            Room No. 415, 4th Floor, Block IV,
                          Old JNU Campus, New Delhi -110 066.
                                 Tel: + 91 11 26161796

                                                Decision No. CIC /OK/A/2008/01295/SG/0926
                                                          Appeal No. CIC/OK/A/2008/01295/

Relevant Facts

emerging from the Appeal

Appellant : Dr. P. L. Lakhani,
406, Santa Rosa, Yogi Hills,
B/H Veena Nagar, LBS Road,
Mulund (W), Mumbai.

Respondent 1 : Prof. S. Ravichandra Reddy,
Acting Director & PIO,
National Assessment & Accreditation Council,
P.O.Box -1075, Nagarbavi,
Banglore-560072.


RTI application filed on                :       10/06/2008
PIO replied                             :       09/07/2008
First appeal filed on                   :       25/07/2008
First Appellate Authority order         :       Not Mentioned.
Second Appeal filed on                  :       10/09/2008

Information Sought:

The Appellant had filed an application seeking information regarding Graduation of Colleges.
There are total 14 queries asked by the Appellant in this regard.

The PIO replied.

The information sought for these questions are available in our manuals for assessment and
accreditation of Universities/colleges. Therefore, you are requested to visit our Website
WWW.naacindia.org. If you need any further clarification in this regard please feel free to contact
us.

The First Appellate Authority ordered:
Not Mentioned.

Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present.

Appellant : Absent
Respondent : Absent
The appellant has mostly asked queries which are not for ‘information’. However,
the PIO has erred in giving information only stating that the information is available ion the
website. Over 90% of India’s population cannot access a website, nor can it use a computer.
Hence the PIO should offer to provide the information in hard copy on payment of the cost of
Rs.2 per page.

Decision:

Appeal is disposed.

This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
7th January, 2009

(For any further correspondence, please mention the decision number for a quick
disposal.)