IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
BANGALORE
DATED "HHS THE 20*" DAY OF ()C'i'OBE_}_§'2{)'.1Vg":,l.__'§__D: '
BEFORE T T T
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE HULUVA
CRIMINAL APPEAT{'N.Q.S§0
BETWEEN:
Dr.P.Padmanabhan,
S/O1ateRama1inga.iah, A
Aged about 65 ye9.r.$,:'_r
R/atDOOrNO..82.6, . T
Ashoka Road, 4U?"s'§/éSi'--C{(533-,.EAu." A
MysO;:e._ ..
(By Sri.vIr.:_.B--.1'<.SV\é§};::?;:~):/Oi; 'xfidg./.. ~
AND:
' Sm2l5<3e}.a Kgishnzi; ---------- .. *
,W.~'.O C DR.K;i.4sh.nan,
T E__A"g,e_d S0 ..ye£}rs,
'ExAéc.ui'1v'e D.i_1fec,'tO"r,
AZQ I*7eFti1i_ZT¢:.ST (P) Ltd.,
j R/21. DOO;fiNO.l490.
A ._ V"'P_andu\}zana Road,
' .. if ~»KuV'e.mpuna gar,
. 'Mysere.
..APPELLANT
..RESPONDENT
“(By Sri.M.J.JaganmOhan & Sri.Srikanth, Advs.)
E”
2
This Criminal Appeal is filed under 378(4) of C1′.P.C.
praying to set aside the judgment and order of acquittal
dt.2.l 1.2007 passed by the Prl. I Civil Eudge (.¥r.Dn.) & J’MFC.,
Mysore, in C.C.No. 197/2007 — acquitting the
respondent/accused for the offence P/U/S. l38 of N.l.Act.
This Criminal Appeal coming on for further .
day, the Court delivered the following:
U1)GMEN’r
This appeal is by the complainant sjss-stialiiig ‘the
acquittal passed by the .¥l\/iFCi,i’l:\_:i/13Isorei,.”in_ c.ecsaNs}i197:2o07 » t
dated 2.1 1.2007.
The filed a complaint against the
respondenti’ia..l;Vleginrg~__th_ei offence under Section .138 of the
” lnstrurric11–ts–.«i’xct for the dishonour of the cheque said
by the accused amounting to Rs.5,00,000/-,
towards theiairsiount borrowed by the accused for her business
kl”-__i”purpose-diuring June 2006. The trial Court, after enquiry, has
. idiismi.sised the complaint. Hence, the complainant is before this
aw
3. During the pendency of the matter, the partieshave
entered into settlement and filed an application under-‘jS’eetio’i1A’
£417 of the Negotiable Instruments Act r/w Section’:§52Q{§)s:}£IidV_”‘_”e H
(8) of Cr.P.C. In terms of the coniproinise,’-«yrespondent’*i9iasi”:
agreed to pay Rs.l2,00,000/- tothe apVpe.lla–nt, to
matter and one more matter pendlingqiaeforell the
Eudge & JMFC, Mysore’, Sirniiltaneously,
the appellant has also agreedto securities
belonging pronote, cheques
if any. ____
4. rhemi:;esp§ha§n: hasfagreed to pay Rs.8,00,0()0/– to the
” eonv;pi’ain.ant..on lllxfi’ lv—.–2–0 ’10 and in turn, the appellant has agreed
Icrirninal case pending before the H Addl. Civil
Jtidge Mysore, immediately after the receipt of the
“first installineiit. Thereafter, on confirmation of withdrawal of
1. 1/20l0, the respondent has agreed to pay the second
winfstallment on l0.l2.2()l0 of Rs.4,00,0{)0/~– towards full and
final settlement of the total amount due.
5. Accordingly, appeai is disposed of in terms o_f__the
Settlement “Memo, permitting the parties to compoiiiié
offence.
Bkp