High Court Kerala High Court

Dr.P.Unneenkutty vs State Of Kerala To Be Rep. … on 29 March, 2007

Kerala High Court
Dr.P.Unneenkutty vs State Of Kerala To Be Rep. … on 29 March, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 4462 of 2007(F)


1. DR.P.UNNEENKUTTY, READER IN COMMERCE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA TO BE REP. SECRETARY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,

3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE

4. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY

5. PRINCIPAL, FAROOK COLLEGE, CALICUT.

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :29/03/2007

 O R D E R
                               K.M.JOSEPH, J.

                  ------------------------------------------

                     W.P.(C).No.4462 OF 2007

                 --------------------------------------------

                  Dated this the 29th day of March, 2007



                              JUDGMENT

Complaint of the petitioner in brief is as follows:

By Ext.P7, the fourth respondent placed the petitioner under

Senior Scale with effect from 27-07-98. Vide Ext.P10 University

granted its approval to the grant of selection grade to the petitioner

with effect from 01/05/2003. By Ext.P11 University has granted

approval to the appointment of the petitioner as Reader. However

financial benefits are not forthcoming. According to the petitioner,

the matter is covered by Ext.P13 judgment. He also relies on the

decision reported in Cherian Mathew vs. Principal, S.B.College,

Changanassery ( 1993(2)KLT 144).

2. I heard learned Government Pleader also.

3. The writ petition is disposed of as follows:

The second respondent will file his objections to Exts.P7,

WPC No.4462/07 2

P10 and P11 before the fourth respondent within a period of one

month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Thereupon, the fourth respondent will consider each and every

objections meticulously and pass a reasoned order which shall be

communicated to the petitioner and to the third respondent within a

period of one month from the date of receipt of the objection. If

the University reiterates its stand taken already in Exts.P7, P10 and

P11, the matter will be governed by the decision in Cherian

Mathew’s case and the monetary benefits due to the petitioner will

be disbursed to him without any further delay.

K.M.JOSEPH

JUDGE

sv.

WPC No.4462/07 3