High Court Kerala High Court

Dr.Philip Poulose vs State Of Kerala on 18 October, 2006

Kerala High Court
Dr.Philip Poulose vs State Of Kerala on 18 October, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 6204 of 2006()


1. DR.PHILIP POULOSE,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SRI.V.P.JOSEPH,
3. SRI.N.A.POULOSE,
4. SRI.P.G.JOSEPH, S/O.GEORGE,
5. SRI.P.A.JOSEPH, S/O.ANTONY,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

 Dated :18/10/2006

 O R D E R
                           J.M.JAMES, J.

                             --------------

             B.A.Nos. 6204/2006 & 6333/2006

                           ------------------

  DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2006




                             O R D E R

The petitioners are before this Court praying

for a pre-arrest order, as they apprehend arrest in crime

No.7/2006 of Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau,

Thrissur, for the offence punishable under Sections 13(2)

read with Section 13(1)(d) of the P.C.Act. (Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988).

2. It is alleged that the petitioners had collected

money from the incumbents, who had been appointed in

Nirmala School at Kundukadu, Thrissur, being managed

by the petitioners and another. On the complaint, the

crime had been registered.

3. Accused Nos. 2 to 6 are the petitioners in

B.A.No.6204/2006 and the first accused is the petitioner in

B.A.No.6333/2006.

4. The counsel for the petitioners submit that the

contributions received are receipted and accounted in the

B.A.Nos. 6204/2006 & 6333/2006

2

building fund of the school and the contributions were

voluntary. There is no personal gain and the acts of the

petitioners do not come within the ambit of Section 13

(1)(d) of the P.C.act, submits the counsel.

5. I heard the arguments advanced by the

learned Director General of Prosecution. I had also gone

through the facts that are available in the file of the

Investigating Officer of Vigilance and Anti Corruption

Bureau, Thrissur. On analysing the facts that are placed

before me, I direct the petitioners to appear before the

Investigating Officer on 30.10.2006 between 10.00 a.m

and 10.30 a.m.

6. The Investigating Officer shall interrogate the

petitioners and in the event of their arrest, they shall be

released on bail, on each one of them executing a bond

for Rs.20,000/-, with two solvent sureties, each for the

like sum, to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer,

arresting them.

7. The petitioners shall report before the

investigation Officer, as and when required, for the

B.A.Nos. 6204/2006 & 6333/2006

3

purpose of the completion of investigation.

The applications are disposed of as above.

J.M.JAMES

JUDGE

mrcs