IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
MJC No.3555 of 2010
DR. BISHUN PADA DUTTA
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.2649 of 2010
DR. NAWAL KISHORE PRASAD
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.585 of 2010
SUBHASH CHANDRA GHOSH
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.586 of 2010
PROF. NAGENDRA PRASAD VERMA
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.587 of 2010
DR. PARAS NATH SINHA
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.1414 of 2010
DR. KRISHNA ACHARI
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.1415 of 2010
DR. AJAY KRISHNA KEOLYAR
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.1416 of 2010
DR. (SMT.) SHAKUNTALA VERMA
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.1418 of 2010
DR. RAM NANDAN SHUKLA
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.1419 of 2010
DR. MADAN PRASAD SINHA
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2
with
MJC No.1420 of 2010
DR. RAJESHWAR PRAASAD SINHA
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.1421 of 2010
DR. MAKESHWAR PRASAD
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.2753 of 2010
DR. YUGAL KISHORE PRASAD YADAV
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
with
MJC No.2648 of 2010
DR. INDU KUMARI
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
-----------
04. 03.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State
as also the respondent – University.
In view of the show cause stating the details of
the payment and the calculation, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that all the above contempt
applications need not proceed further and the same are
accordingly, disposed of.
It will be open for the petitioners to bring it to
the notice of the concerned authority with regard to any
discrepancy in calculation. In case such discrepancies
are brought to the notice of the Registrar of the University
the same may be looked into.
In view of the above, since the order has been
3
complied with, this contempt application need not
proceed further and the same stands disposed of.
Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)