. ' " :Dr.:é;%I3mi%:%i/f<~%ady4 ' %%%%% W '
' V , (3't1air1nuan'i£s4I}.ircctcr 01' Dr.Re:dc1y's
*LabcratGz.'1'_&$ I.1;d'.- Pint N0. 16,IDA
VV _ Pvt Ltd, '7£Z)fi'i<::e "?-1-2'? Amceqwt
' ~ ,. « .4 _ Efifjyderabagi 5000 18.
g k';'~:.1m=:~i K;Safish Ready,
. ._ Director of fir. RedE:':'1'i'€:)N. z1fJ0.V%?;84?Si 1
BETWEEN :
Dr.Reddy's
Plot No. 16, .§{DA'_'K6th:gjr, '
Mehboob Naga1*»..}3£1'1st1'ict,,.C3'/o. M"/s
Girish Labe:at:3I*ie§fi.:Pxrt;' ~ Ltci. Réigx "
Office 7,~1----2'? A111::t::r'pet,.._Hy,derabad
5000 16,"'~:fr3p2fe$.;€:Iit<'JCl .by. 3 _ 4 "
its Company Sacretazy ,. '
Mr. V.VishWanath. "
Kotfiur, Mehboob Nagar
Distxict, £3/:2 -M15 Girish Laboratories
Pvt Ltd, Reg, Ofiice 7« L2'? Amecrmt
Hyderabad 503016.
Petitienerfi
{ By IBVA Assoeiates Sri K.G.Raghava1:, " .
AND:
1. State at the instance .f7 * _'c@rpct
Hyde:jaLi._a¢1V5G0O.}6."_' H "
. . .Respondents
(*3? $i.I3§9;b:éfishetty, HCGP. )
flied {#83482 of Cr.P.(;':.
. :sé}:i:. aside the order datad 31.033006
§ags¢a b3§.'t}§§3:;Pr1* JMFC in CC Nmfllfi/06 taking
_ ' 'gogaiiafiég an Qfffiflfifi under parafifiz 9 & i4«{1}
x§I._71;Ligé" (PIice Cantml) Grater 1993 Elvis sx:=:ct:ion
_ _A3(12;(<:;f7 of Essenfial Ccmmodity Act 1955 P/U/S
% -----.' §'(§§{A)(ii) of Essential Commedities Act R/W para 24
'4 DPQG $95 and also the order 9:' issuing summons
'4 via the petitierzers wide Axmexure 'A' and dismiss the
comylaint in CC Nc:.,71(}[{}6 pending on the fiia of Pr}.
JMFQ, C,':u1harga so far as the §.'1€1'iS concemad
This petition coming on for orders this day; "1316
court made {he following :
O R D E R
Haard learned Government P1ead£:r.’fQ$V 1’sé »
and the counsel appears for ” w ‘V
2. This petition under .s'<:e:_tio11 4;8:"2 of
in question the cognxzan' cc court
and 'of éiixnmbns to the petitioners
and is that the petiticner has
been BECELAC capsulm (for
U V us~";}~' arid the notifaczaijon dated
by the NPPA is far faxing the
ii} respect of the capsnlw which am
mea;r7§ i- for Thempentiiz Use and the:-efom the
Vcgfigtenfion 3f the mtitiener is that the capsuim that
. V. 'fis manxfiactmed by it am aunt meant for Propizylatztic
Use and accardirlgly the gazette notification in
quastian is net appfiazfgbie to the case ef the
miiticinazz T§1emf<:r&, $2115: comzanae taken by the
%
4
tria}. Ceurt arid issuing summons is 11nsustaiI1abié–,i11
law. The further geund urged are that ”
under the Essentia} Commodities Act ‘ _
para-9 and 14(1) of the
1995 are to be tried by spa¢ia1’e§m¢ ask A
12AA 9f the EC Act. _ _ ‘_ I
3. Having thus, véansidéifid Qounds
relying on the Apex to tficrein
and the stag1d’i;9;}{e:1:3-.by herein that the
Caps;i.;1e*« meant for Prophyiactic
use anti Vftizfx Use, the question 0f
pfioé ” under the notification dated
24. Emame appiicable wili net: arista.
. tzma’ 1 smart {night 11:: have axamixmd {ha
va¥’iQ1§s.:_§;i§:1exux€s produced by the petitioner befere
” to issue summons. AS such, the ordar of
¥;h$ Magistrate issuixzg summons cannet be sustained
‘ in Raw. Apart {mm this, ether éefect naticed is that:
the trial cuurt; has not perused the znataziais placed
Kn-»:”k.o&
by the fiwiritianar 311:1 the court even refe to them
A.
3%”
5
«L ‘7WW ;
or statifig that it has taken cogxiizancze of i:h§~~s.’:l}’Vfi::{_}_.(:tj:_,_’-‘»’se~£7
{G tria} ceurt mechanically ordered 3 ‘ ‘
the petitieners and for this Elie
the triai court cammt be laW., *- : .. 2
4. For the afaresaid -»pctitio:1v–.is.-éillowed
and proceeding ‘% CC’ ordering
$u.mmons to” V asidé.
sax: