High Court Karnataka High Court

Dr S V Janardhan vs The Bangalore Metropolitan … on 30 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Dr S V Janardhan vs The Bangalore Metropolitan … on 30 June, 2009
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala
-flwwm vavctwrrwvxmm wt mwmwswmmmnmm !E"'¥i"€u'3'!!E"'# '3w'mai'*%»#¥%$ Vvuetfflw Wflfigvfikfiflfifi      

IN IRE HEERWCGHRTW2FBflEfi@3fiK3.E?£UDRflU9EE 

mm: rm am 39*' am or mam20:23_ '%j%7%f »

£HFURE

1'1/m HW'1'3I2E' r2R.Jv3m"c£  

!~£.F..A.I~b.4418f2£?£i;'f.. 

BETWEEN':

Dr S 1: Jmm.m+mr_A   V  AA A.

AGED 14.30111: 48 mass     
sic Lm'E-s P  ' "
aim: 1*Ij-*E3i'.."'?.Z ."*3.- =-3_";;EL£>CX  
     A 

 """    Amr.,J

  I*m'I'EOPCiLI'2'?§1'I
 _ cmmsmnr cckmrenrxoze
V 'VIC H_RQAD';«-._BAR'GAI.ORE-2'?
X   1a£?R'E$I§:mD%
 fB¥;%«x";£*.s"_~V',1;zfisr§:3sE1a .. . nzspannmr

 ,.j ;:s3L¥ Stat H R mmxa, mv.,)

  .2»zI'*.§. 211.39 {US 173:1: or am? ACT AGAINST
 '1'§_1E"w.JUD|3!'-EMT Ann A'iU?sF.D DA'£'ED:11..1.05 Passsn IN
 é1~zo.2246ioo 01: mm FILE 0:' mm Imxn,
 ~1.~m:"::, zmto I-ELL, Bmeawzuz, sea; 143.29,
--  A . .1'.'!Efl-KISSING 'mm cmzn '£'E'£'I'I.'I£3N ma
 commsarzw.

THIS APPEAL CGHINB QN FQR FINAL HEAREMS
THIS E3; Tfifi C903? DfiLI?ER£B THE EGLLGWING:



J6

JUB-311535'

Tha appallamtftzfiamaxr of ths   M

hearing registzaticn 1'¥o.KPs-O§v¥i~i¥'5??v3«._i:a  

this Court urxdar Se<:t:.i.c::rx_1'73 ('.'!.) '--.;:r1f 

Vehicles Act, 1988 prayin'¢g:"for .s'a.fé_t~iiigéV";gV§icie

the irgugned Judgkaagnt V "-23wa::éiV'" fiatad

11.1.2095

made in me’ ma fiila

of Court of Cé_._u3_a$:?3c3.§.fii.i;’–.. Accident

(:1 aims ity .

2. the appellaratl:

asul:2mx.’ta that -of the Mamti
cap in q:;;;s’tian mg.a aviclaim patitmn seating

50I.’):’– to-mrda the dosage

cm2aar£i._ ” _+:_¢e £25; 5f.#?i9J:1:i.c:1«a due to rush and

%’;geg;igen£’%%– dr3.#’i’iig of the mrz.:~c., hue: by ice

A

In suppart: or the case at the

‘ he got hisnaelf examined :33 W1,

bésides examining one Ganah Kayak-PW Zfgamga

wt!-1Vot.h’M0″‘m mllwhfllfltfi Mwuwm mm m»mmIsw.$m».v*’mm.&’% SHH9%£&F’I$”fi vmwwaw wrmMmwm1.Mmm awemgws MWMW

h

in this appeal. ‘1’hm:a1’£ore, the
Judgment: may he set aside and the

be remitted back. to tha Tribunal w:i.i:h_ %

to the awnex: to adducza fuzzthcfi:

any.

‘2’. The ‘1’ribunal__ has ias§c11a.,_’A

holding that on mm.

dad: to rash arzd 4::-ag_;.’1ig;ai:iif; bus
bearing regig4t$§§:§§:? ., by its
driver, is _ ragi st rati an
n¢.Ia;-c5~1i£+5′?vA ‘*zea§’,a§§§;aga¢:. But, in the
inzgugnad Ju<'iég'm:g::!;' held that the
nfizt ~ 1?. C: En-at at any

shcaw that he was the ownez

of tfie-_ Gate of the accident and

71' t1.$erefm: é' wj e'¢'§ed the Claim Petition.

Txzibunal new not determined the

' V'V:é2-aé';'g an':3atioz1 payahu towards damage caused to
The Claimant azppeatxas to be undax a

vfiuonfiide belief that he has pxaduczsnd the copy

ef RC' as mentionad in thus affidavit filed in

mwwwtw -em mmnammmmmm mamm mwwm mi' ¥"'EE?€Z%§-§ fimfifif Q?» éiififlwfiffififl Hififi flfiufi

lien at examizzatian-in-chief and 5.13:: the

lint: of dcscuznenta but the

forthcoming in the: records at

Hanna, it smuld meet the) 3

amt asida the im@ugna§_Jud§mént

remand the matter to liberty

to the parting! e§i&§nca, if
any and dispa-as ct' tw; .–'«:i1i1vAA-'.I'g.v;::?4§c:1ra, the appeal is
alloéggd. Judgment and Award
dated. 11.1*.kk2oes 319.2246/zooo an

the £i,:I..L§ “ax: cefir1:V Vc£ sma11 Causes/Addl. Master

K¢¢é.defit __’I’ribuna3. at Bnngalout City are

set matter is remitted back to

thy ‘ ;with a d.im::tic>n t<::~ afftz-rd an

ta pxoduce doctiments and auckiuca

f=..:f§;;:th§'r' evidence, if any, and dispase raf the

accardmca with law. No costs.

L

Jt”””|!£’OAdl”% maczwrrem wwwmmw Wm; amwuwmvw:r”\ws.<w&mma**a_ meawwiw 'Qum%é"'3in45'ii':'£.L§ MM' iZ'¥z.,:$””€’¢l#”§.é””f(\ s2″”€9kR%$¥'”‘$ “‘w%¢5’%&’?}’\’c.

10. The parties axe ciizzacztad to

before the Tribunal on _:}m3__.___§M_.?0mm§§

proceedings without nctiae.

11. The Regiatxy is:”:.di[;?m{:téd. “ta.

the LURE f0I’ChWJ.th. ‘