High Court Kerala High Court

Dr.V.K.Gopi vs The State Of Kerala on 13 November, 2007

Kerala High Court
Dr.V.K.Gopi vs The State Of Kerala on 13 November, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 29295 of 2007(K)


1. DR.V.K.GOPI, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR IN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.K.S.SAIRA

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :13/11/2007

 O R D E R
                             S. SIRI JAGAN, J.

                         --------------------------

                      W.P.(C)No.29295 OF 2007

                          -------------------------

                Dated this the 13th day of November, 2007


                                JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a doctor in the Medical Education Service.

He has been proceeded against in disciplinary proceedings for

unauthorized absence. Memo of charges were issued and an

enquiry was conducted in which he was found guilty. The

punishment of removal from service has been imposed on him.

The petitioner is challenging the same. The petitioner has no

grievance regarding the procedure adopted in the disciplinary

proceedings. The petitioner also does not dispute the fact that

the petitioner was in fact unauthorisedly absent. The petitioner’s

grievance is that the punishment of removal from service is too

harsh.

I am of opinion that the petitioner having proceeded on

leave without getting the leave sanctioned, cannot now complain

about the proceedings adopted by the Government. The

Government is facing a situation where there are not enough

doctors in the State Service. As such, the Government has to

W.P.(c)No. 29295/07 2

deal with persons who are unauthorisely absent very sternly.

As such, I do not find anything wrong with the Government

imposing punishment of removal from service on a doctor, who

has been unauthorisedly absent for long. Therefore, I do not

find any merit in the writ petition and accordingly the same is

dismissed.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd

W.P.(c)No. 29295/07 3