High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Dr. Veena Pandey vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors. on 19 January, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Dr. Veena Pandey vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors. on 19 January, 2011
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             MJC No.52 of 2010
          1. DR. VEENA PANDEY W/O MR. ARUN KUMAR PANDEY R/O
          MOHALLA- PATLIPUTRA COLONY, HOUSE NO. 4, P.S.-
          PATLIPUTRA, DISTT.- PATNA
                                 Versus
          1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SRI ANUP MUKHARJI, THE
          CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA
          2. SRI C.K. MISHRA, THE SECRETARY HEALTH DEPARTMENT,
          GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA
          3. SRI RAVI PARAMAR, THE SPECIAL SECRETARY HEALTH
          DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA
          4. SRI RAM CHANDRA PASWAN, THE JOINT SECRETARY HEALTH
          DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA
          5. SRI PRAVIN KUMAR, THE DEPUTY SECRETARY HEALTH
          DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA
          6. SRI S.P. SINGH, THE DIRECTOR CHIEF HEALTH DEPARTMENT,
          GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA
                               -----------

02. 19.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

for the opposite parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly

concedes that the departmental proceedings have been

concluded and final orders have been passed. He

however submits that the period in between 5.7.1995

and 25.9.1995, as also 1.11.1995 to 31.1.1996 all

related to claim for regularization of leave and which

was not the subject matter in either of the two

departmental proceedings and still in the garb of the

order of the Writ Court, the respondents have refused

to deal with that period and take any final decision.

The petitioner is due for superannuation on

31.1.2011.

If what the petitioner contends is correct, in
2

all fairness the respondents were themselves required

to deal with this aspect of the matter, if the question

had been raised by the petitioner before them earlier.

The petitioner is stated to have represented

to this effect on 7.9.2010.

Let the opposite parties consider the

representation of the petitioner dated 7.9.2010 and

pay the legitimate dues, if any, for the aforesaid period

within a maximum period of four weeks from the date

of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

The application stands disposed.

P.K.                                       ( Navin Sinha, J.)