High Court Kerala High Court

E.K.Rajan vs Thrissur District Arecanut on 20 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
E.K.Rajan vs Thrissur District Arecanut on 20 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34257 of 2008(C)



1. E.K.RAJAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. THRISSUR DISTRICT ARECANUT
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SANTHOSH  (PODUVAL)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :20/11/2008

 O R D E R
           THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
                 -------------------------------------------
                    W.P(C).No.34257 OF 2008
                 -------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 20th day of November, 2008


                             JUDGMENT

Having regard to the nature of the directions being issued

hereunder, notice to respondents 1 and 3 dispensed with,

preserving their right to move for review of this judgment, if

aggrieved. Learned Government Pleader appears for the second

respondent.

2. The first respondent obtained an arbitration award under

the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 as against the third

respondent. That is put in execution. The third respondent has

filed R.P.No.58/08 before the Kerala Co-operative Tribunal

constituted under the KCS Act. The petitioner is the assignee of

an item of property that belonged to the third respondent. In

the course of execution of the award, that property has been

attached. The petitioner aspires to resurrect that property from

attachment for his personal purpose. He states that he had

WPC.34257/08

Page numbers

already submitted a pay order for the principal amount before

the Tribunal and that the said matter is pending consideration.

3. After arguing the matter for some time, the petitioner

agrees to deposit the entire amount covered by the arbitration

award, including the interest component, before the learned

Tribunal to be dealt with in accordance with the decision that the

Tribunal may render in the Revision Petition. The Tribunal could

also consider whether the monies so deposited could be released

to the first respondent, subject to the result of the Revision

Petition, so that the debtor under the award would not suffer any

further liability to pay interest, while he would be entitled to

refund of any amount, if found due on the basis of the decision

that the learned Tribunal may ultimately render on the Revision

Petition.

Hence, it is directed that the petitioner will deposit the

entire amount as aforesaid before the Kerala Co-operative

WPC.34257/08

Page numbers

Tribunal and seek appropriate orders in the light of what is

stated above. The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
Judge.

kkb.