IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 25939 of 2010(N)
1. E.P.SHEREEF, PROPRIETOR,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,
... Respondent
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
3. THE INSEPCTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
For Petitioner :SRI.C.K.THANU PILLAI
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Dated :17/08/2010
O R D E R
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
..............................................................................
W.P.(C) No. 25939 OF 2010
.........................................................................
Dated this the 17th August , 2010
J U D G M E N T
Challenging Exts.P1 to P3 assessment orders under the
CST Act passed by the first respondent, the petitioner has
already filed Exts.P4, P7 and P10 appeals along with Exts, P5,
P8 and P11 petitions for condonation of delay in filing the appeals
and Exts.P6, P9 and P12 petitions for stay, which are pending
consideration before the second respondent. The grievance of
the petitioner is that without any regard to the pendency of the
above proceedings,Exts.P13 to P15 notices have been issued by
the third respondent for realisation of the amount stated as due
from the petitioner, which in turn is subjected to challenge in
this Writ Petition.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the second
respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders
W.P.(C) No. 25939 OF 2010
2
on the above petitions for condonation of delay and for stay in
accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,
within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the
judgment. It is made clear that till such orders are passed on
the above petitions, all further proceedings pursuant to Exts. P13
to P15 shall be kept in abeyance.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,
JUDGE.
lk