" A -~(Ey Sri ; P S MANJUNATH . NO. 13310 OR 200'2('S:xI{ES.]:_j ~ = R'
BETWEEN
1 E SURESH S/O LATE
SECOND DEV-ISIONACLERK " . "
BRUHAT }3AI§:j§}ALOjRE>-1y:A1~;A.:V€,AGAraA PALIKE
DATE OE.;'ENTRY 3N'SERV1CE':2/ 12/95.
2 MAYANNA S/O':_'LA'fE'L'JARAYANAPPA
SDA, '=AGE;36- Y-EARS; EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
{SHANTHINAGAR)'BR'UTH BANGALORE
__;MA1~1ANAGARA PALIKE, MAYOHALL,
. ~ RESIDENCY BANGALORE
r , DATE OE ENTRY IN SERVICE 24/1/95.
E S /O RANGAPPA
, 'SDA,'AGE:50 YEARS, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
1- {ERARA;L1NAGAR)BRUHAT BANGALORE MA}-IANAGAR
PALEKE, MAYOHALL, RESIDENCY ROAD,
---- A , _ BANGALORE.
" _ "DATE OF ENTRY IN SERVICE: 22/3/78,
'-- PETITIONERS
{COMMON}
xix
~ * "S/O. LATE C RAMAKRISHNAPPA
_ {By SEIT. M C NAGASHREE : GA FOR R1)
* «-{BY N 171 m'EGO 'pA,"FOR R2 8: R3]
(BYSRI. V'.S_1\}"A._IK 8: SMT. MANJULA N KULKARNI.
' I 'SAETAKUMAR S PATIL, ADVS EOR R4)
I'-'J
GOVT OE KARNATAKA '
BY PRLSECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENf'I';
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT .. I " N *
DEPARTMENT ._ s '
M.S.BUILDIN'G,vIKASA SOUDHA, ' 1. "
BANGALORE.
BRUHAT BANGALORE
BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ' " ~. - *
N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE..--.
THE ADMINISTRATOR. _ if 1'
BRUHAT BANGALORE"MAHAI\1"AGAR!?g .RALIKE
N.R.SQUARE; BANGALORE;
SMT S W/OM; VASUDEVA BABU
AGED ABOUT 45 YEAjBs;~--.
OEI1'1QE"'~QF 'I11-I:_E ENGINEER
[BINNYP.E§7F]BF€§UHAT_BAN'GALORE MAHANAGARA
PALEKE, Sm*MAIN;~M.C.LA.'yOUT,
VIJAYA.NAGARA; BANGA.LORE~40.
- K! ' RESPONDENTS
COMMON
PRO15OSED”‘I?1’wt4LEADING APPLICANTS IN
I MISC’;–W1«_2194/09:
GOVINDARAJU
” AGE 49 YEARS
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
DOMMALUR SUB–DWISION f
I5);-I9;
x
BBMP, BANGALORE.
PUTTASHESHAGIRI
S /O. DASAPPA
AGE 50 YEARS
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
BBMP, 4TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR.
BANGALORE. — –
P JAYARAM
S/O. PANDURANGAPPA _
AGE 43 YEARS _
ASST. ENGINEER
KMRP DIVISION O.
43% BLOCK JAYANAGAR, ‘ –
AMOHAN KUMAR _ .
S /O. LATE S’ASH\2s.rA*1*I~LAIA1+I._”~A.__
AGE 43 ”
ADTP{S0UTH1_.I..BBM_:3_ ._
JAYANLAGAR, BANGALfORE.,I-
RI’: RAJEGOW:;)A_ _
S/-O. KALEC-.OwI)A._ —
AGE 49 ”
ASST’: IEXECU’I*IVE.. ENGINEER
O /o CHIEF ENGINEER
I .;?¥”H BLOCK, _BBMR B’LORE.
M KRISHNA
O “S/O. T. MANI
IAG’E”4,3 YEARS
A ‘ASST;E:\IGINEER
“—HQ_R’1″ICULTURE[\NEST)
BBMP, MALLESHWARAM, B’LORE.
_ I ‘PARAMESHWARA
– S/O. K T LAKKANNA
ASST. ENGINEER
O/O CHIEF ENGINEERISWD] . fl
E4122:-mm
IO
11
4?” BLOCK BBMP, JAYANAGAR
BANGALORE.
K N RAGHUNATH
S/O. K C NANJEGOWDA
AGE 46 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
ADTP, MAYOHALL
M G ROAD, BANGALORE.
R NITHIN
s/O. LATE H C RAJASHEKARANQ
ASST. ENGINEER
O /0 CHIEF ENGINEER ‘ ”
4TH BLOCK, BBMP _
BANGALORE. ‘ ‘~
K MANJUNATHA – V ,
S/O. RUDRAPPA
AGE 46 YEARS’ _ 1
AssT.ENGINI%;ER ~. j _ I
O/_o_. ” I I
4??! BLOCi€_vBB.?3/E15′ _
BANG_A.LORE;j-__’=
C SADASHIVA .–
S/O. CHIKKALEGOWIOA
I AGE. 48 YEARS
– ENGINEER
O/o._AI)’I”I?V(vvEsI’}
I V _ E’BE’IvI:i»,. BANGALORE.
:27
R_C£I;AR’DRAsHEEAR
‘vs/O. C ‘S RAMAIAH
AGF249 YEARS
_ WORKING AS O/O ADTP
A I WI/HITE FIELD MAIN ROAD
” ~MAHADEVAPURA, B’LORE.
bi
‘\
13
14
15
16
I7.
I “VS/’Q.’IN”S£’1IvADEvAIA}I
AG’E”‘–:1.8 YEARS
, ‘ASST; -ENGINEER
– YE.SI~IwANTIiAI>URA
A 518
R NARENDRA BABU
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
KEMPEGOWDA NAGAR
J C ROAD, BANGALORE.
H M SHIVAPRASAD
S/O. LATE M VISWESWARAIAH
AGE 48 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
O /o ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER_’_AS ~
K G HALLI SUB-DIVISION? .’ .
BBMP, QUEENS ROAD,
R RAMPRASAD _ A
S/O. LATE L RANGEGOWDA .,
AGE 51 YEARS ” I — 1
ASST. ENGINEER
OFFICE ASSI*Sf:’ANfi*”E;>=, BANGALORE.
S KUMAR
EBMP. BANGALORE.
R MAI-IESH KUMAR
” –*S/O. C RANGEGOWDA
AGE 48 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER E §
N1
-bf”
~ : S/O. NARASHIMHA SI-IETIY
“ASST. ENGINEER
19
20
21
22
HMT, BBMP, BANGALORE.
K V PRASAD
S / O. K SHIVARAO
AGE 45 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
WARD NO.46, J C NAGAR
BBIVEP, BANGALORE.
S REVANNA
S / O. SIDDAPPA
AGE 44 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
WARD NO.17, J P PARK
BBMP, BANGALORE.
SATHIS KUMAR
S /0. D v SWAMY
AGE 42 YEARS
ASST.
HEBBAL .. .
BBMP, .§3A:N«.3ALop.E;~..V’S_A ”
S}\SAvmAg”jS 7
AGE48 ”
ASST*…ENG1NEER = . ”
AJDTP. BB3/IP.,. BANGALORE.
NAG-ARAJS’ ‘ ”” ” ”
S/0., LAEE D H RUDRAPPA
_ T_ ” ‘ASST. – ENGINEER
– OFFICE JDTP
S’ BB,»/£PE.31.:’»m\IGA1;oRE.
K VNZKRISHNAMURTHY
“O/0. ASST. DIRECTOR
OF’ TOWN PLANNING WVEST} BBMP
SHESI-IADRIPURAM, BANGALORE.
$1,
M
25
26
27
2.8
RAMACHANDRA
S/O. DEVEGOWDA
AGE 47 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
O/0 ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
YELACHENAHALLI SUB–DIV§SION
BBMP, BANGALORE.
B VTVEKANANDA J _
S/0. M BHEEMANNA ‘ ”
AGE 49 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER .
OFFICE OF ASST. EXECUTIVE ENG. V
VIJAYNAGAR SUB–DIVISIONu,” ‘BBMP ‘ ~-
BANGALORE.
BAMAHADEVA’ _
S /0. B ANNEGOWDA
AGE 44 YEARS ‘-
WARD 510,7:-;;~*_ A
LAGGERE_SU13:p1V-1.S1QNV__ ” _
ASST. EXECUTIVE. E2\IG1NEEE’ V’
B333/iii.”BA;$3GA3;GRE..S.:”j
K S
S/O.’D_BAvSAI-_’PA =
AGE 48″YE)ARS ‘
.. «EWARD NO’. 1.7 V
– BI-3MP;’A–BA1\¥GALORE.
V: ” K
* TS/0. “_EEMJ9ASHETrY
S’ , ‘AGE.51?–
BEMP. JAYANAGAR
BANGALORE.
“CHINNA MAREGOWDA
* S/G. EREGOWDA
AGE 48 YEARS
ASST. ENGENEER Hg
31
32
33
34
OFFICE OF ADTP[EAST)
MAYOHALL, BBMP, BLORE.
A RAVINDRA BABU
S / O. ASHWANATHNARAYA REDDY
AGE 46 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER, WARD NO.15O
MARATHAHALLI, SUB–DEVISION””
MAHADEVAPURA ZONE 1
BBMP, BANGALORE.
SHIVALINGEGOWDA _
S/0. LATE NINGEGOWDA *
AGE 53 YEARS ‘
WARD NGI50,
OFFICE OF ASST. E:;E.cI;II?JI:
ENGINEER, i .–
SUB–DIVISIoN_, BB’MI5,’Bf1.ORE,
AFSAR N”AYAZI.f. * _ _
S/0. ABDUL. GH’:ANI”‘¥.’j I-
AGE…50″‘3?EAi?§3 , C ” ”
A{3SISTA.’\1T E§.’LGI1\_EEE;R _
O/,0 ASE3i;°3TANTVD’EREC’1’OR
TOWN PLANN [E__A’.E’»T}
BBMR BANCALoR_E’;;.
PVIJAY
– S 9APEGOWi’)A
AGE. YEARS
V _ ” ‘ASS1STAN*1j ENGINEER
” OP”FI_C..E ASSISTANT
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
JEEVAN BHIMANAGARA
SUB–DIVISION, DOMLUR
n BANGALORE.
*8 V CHANDRASHEKAR
S / O. LATE T VENKATAREDDY
AGE 48 YEARS E
47
48
49
V. 12 ESURESH
AGE 44 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
OFFICE OF ADTP
BATMQAYANAPURA, BBMP
BANGALORE.
N R MAHESH
S / O. GANGEGOVVDA
AGE 45 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
WARD N022
J C NAGARA SUB–DIVISI,0N
BBMP, BANGLAORE.
PPRASAD
S/0/rPU’F1″ASW. IY
AGE 47 YEARS ;
JUNIOR ENGINEER
PADMANABHANAGAR .
SUB–DIVSIION. ‘ ‘V
BBMP, ‘V
S;-10. P NI’k_E’s1JAPPA ., *
AGE 53 YEARS, *
ASSISTANT”EN’GINEE_R
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR
IDBMP, BANGALORE.
S-/O, K RAJU
V ” ‘ AGE 45 YEARS
* .__«ASSI_STAI\’z’*1′ EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
HEE1-3; ;’SUE–D1v1S1oN
B}_31VIP.–*”BANGALORE.
I’-‘I
“z_S/0. LATE V RAMABHADRAIAH
‘ SAGE 53 YEARS
0/ O. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF
ii
is
52
53
54
55
TOWN PLANNING, EAST ZONE
BBMP, BANGLAORE.
K N KRISHNA NAIK
S/O. K S NANYA NAIK
OFFICE OF DEPUTY COMMISSION
[ADMINISTRATION]
BBMP, BANGALORE.
G RAVINDRANATH
S/O. GOPALAKRESHNA RAG
AGE 48 YEARS ‘ ._ .5
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER”‘ . I
KPWD QUAR’I’ERS__ _ ._
JEEVANBHEEMANAGARA
BANGALORE–56O 0=:*5,.. — ‘ ‘
G MALL1KARJUNA””*
S /0. N GAN’GANNA
AGE 46-YEARS–.’_ ~ 4 _ I
_
VSRINAGAR
N:0.953;..S?H Cif1vL1xII~J,5″
BASA*v’ESHE’«’ABLANAGA}{– I
3RD. STAGE, 3RD.B”LO’GR
BANGALORE. _ ‘
3 _;R” RAVISTLANKAR V’
A ‘S/_O. S. RAJASH-EKARAPPA
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
A ” ” VNO..97.5~, .V38T” CROSS
._ %23RD-~,MAI’N;”‘4TH T BLOCK
A V ‘ JA3_rA1~.1AGAR, BANGALORE.
I R
S/”O. LATE SHIVARAMAIAH
I AGE 49 YEARS
‘ — ASSISTANT ENGINEER
O / 0 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF
TOWN PLANNINCHEAST) ? a
‘*1
2
A}
5’7
58
59
60
61;
E
MAYOHALL, BANGALORE.
MOHAMMED JAFAR SADIQ
S/O. AMIR SAB
AGE 47 YEARS
No.27, KAVERINAGARA
BANGALORE — 79.
M G NAGARAJA
S/0. M GURURAJACHAR
AGE 48 YEARS _
ASSISTANT ENGINEER ‘
0/ 0. ASSISTANT EXEcUTI”VE”ENG1NEERR
JAYANAGAR SUB~DI\/ISION ” –
BBMP, 4TH ELocK,._JAYANAGAR_,
ASHOKSBIRADAR _ .
S/O. Dr.SANGANA.GO\?»’7§)A
ASSISTANT ”
0/ 0. ASSfSTi’&_Nf’F ENGINEER
JAYANAGAR. SU’B«IjIVfIS10N ‘ _ ”
BBMP, ‘4T,H”BLQcI:, ‘JAYANAGAR
BfLORE;~
H .
S/0.”C_HI1KI{£’–\NNA GGWDA
AGE 47-YEARS *
, ._;0’/ ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
– “I 36TH CR’O:~’3S’,’ 26TH MAIN
aw BLOCK, JAYANAGAR
E ” ‘EAxIG.ALQRE.
GGWEA
S /:0. GOWDA
AGE 4-} YEARS
O/’O. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
VRROJECT (EAST), BBMP
” ~’MAYo:I~IALL. BANGALORE. Vi
L
“‘\
JUNIOR ENGINEER
PROJECT DIVISION
MAHADEVAPURA ZONE
BBMP, K R PURAM, BANGALORE.
{BY SRI. B N SHIVANNA A/S FOR IMPLEAOINITI’-.,V’ A’ I
APPLICANTS) 1′ *- ‘
‘= K
{BY SR1. A NAGARAJAPPA A/S, EORIMPLEAOING . In
APPLICANTS)
MISC. WRIT 12194/O9 FILED UNDVEIR ORI*§ER’I_L,RL:I3LEt
10 OF CPC R/w HIGH COURT w*R;*T.PROC–EEI3I_IsIGs RULES
PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION AND. ‘PERMIT THE
PROPOSED APPLICANTS TO,=t:O ” T. ON RECORD AS
RESPONOENTS. ; .
MISC .WRIT ..12I95/O9 PILELI UND’E.R–. SECTION 151
OF CPCP R/W.,I-{.IG§aI COURT;WRIT,_PROCEEDING RULES
PRAYINO TO EXTEND TI-IE ‘STAY ‘OEAPPLICANTS OF BBMP
TILL APRIL 52010 ‘wI,IIC«L;I-..___IS_ TRANSFER PERIOD AFTER
ACADEMIC YEAR IS CLQSEjD_ APPLICANTS WILL JOIN
IN THE DERARTMIENT’;
TI-IESJSIE1VMIS(§;EfV’JIRI’fS4:'(§OMING ON FOR ORDERS.
THIS DAY COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING :
_0RDER
I I2194/O9 is filed by the Engineers in the
Senfiees Ofithietstate, on deputation to the respondent-
“V._BruhatIBaI1ga1Ore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), aggrieved
Order cit. 1.12.2009 Of the State Government
directing their repatriation. It is the contention Of the
bi
16
petitioners that during the pendency of the writ petition
on 24.11.2009 this Court directed the respondent-
BBMP to repatriate all employees on deputation
parent department, not within the ~
applicants and hence are proper arrd.r1ec_essar3i’part_ies”._ it
for a complete adjudication of the
2. Heard the learned counsel’ for”th.leappflicé1nts,
perused the averments. “th’je:’appplication. The
writ petitioners, iappointed. to ‘vacant in a regular
recruitrnent,–~ it “Second Division
Clerks the;2f%d«..__resporid.entéBBMP constituted under
the Karnataka Corporations Act, 1976,
aggrieiIed~ by the.V_.order dt. 14.5.2007 Annexure–S of the
3??’respondent;/ikdministrator accepting the note of the
and the resolution of the Taxation
j andua Standing Committee of the BBMP to
ljabsorb the 4th respondent, a First Division Clerk on
‘ deputation, from the State services, have presented the
M
19
(3) of Rule 50 of KCSRS, a direction was issued to the
BBMP to place on record particulars of:
a) all persons on deputation from _
services;
b) the orders passed by the
over the period of dep:;tation.;”V’h’
extention, if any;
c] persons absoflied ‘the-Tservices of the
BBMP, while on_,:’depii.tatio’r1v.Vh’ the decision
in Mjuiliiyappaf of Karnataka
and add_i’ti.on the Government
.– secure instructions
over the number of civil
A”servants_.l’ “with particulars sent on
a _ depu_:aao:1m:he BBMP.
‘l«.On”‘~–9.ll.2009, when the lawyers abstained
one Ramegowda, Asst. Law Officer was
‘.VpresentV'”and. furnished the list of 820 employees, on
“w~:dfd.epdutpation from the State service and other
i organisations to serve in the BBMP. It was pointed out
is
20
that the persons whose names were shown at
Sl.Nos.144~ to 152, 154, l55 and 736 were absorbed into
the services of the BBMP, though on deputatatioii,
Hence time was extended upto
respondent–BMl\/IP to have its say ..-oV_er ”
deputation without the orders of :”exte_nsion’~.u’n:derVV
50(3) of KCSRS.
7. On 16.11.2009; E7-_ri.IV.{A.N-«_.{§1it’tegowda,H5learned
counsel for the, BBMP. even date
enclosing t’o””26 persons who
were {relating to 198 persons
excluding V”-4tl’i.Vp’ rlespoindent, whose period of
deputAatio~n had .._e§tpired and in respect of whom the
StateVnad«.not”~passed orders under Rule 50(3) of KCSRS,
exte1i_dingV”.”t1qep::.period of deputation. That memo was
[taken zonareeord and on the said date, a direction was
5′ the BBMP to consider the case of the 4″?
respondent alongwith 198 deputationists over retaining
tit
2]
them though their term had expired and had not been
relieved. On 20.11.2009 at the request of the,_G.ovt._.
Advocate matter was adjourned to 24.11.§{0’09..;_’ _
which date the 1n–charge l?rl..Secre’tary:;’_~~ 2 it “=
Development Dept, Governmentlpp of” 9′ V:w.a’s:;_ *9
present and sought two weel1;;:s~.,.time*..t_o takevdliraecessaryd
action over recalling 198 VAdep’u.tationists–.,anAdf issue
orders to deputy other the BBMP and
hence, the rnatter was 7; .2009.
8. __ for the State files a
memo of that on 24.11.2009, orders
were passedby”the.VA’B§f§lsfl2PV.’dt. 1.12.2009 wherein 134
out 1198 deptitationists were repatriated to their
par-ent In the memo it is further stated
thatvdne’ egdgencies, 55 doctors would be continued
nupto’ while two engineers involved in BBMP
A ..:if’*I€2′.:lect.ion’s would be continued till the election process is
N
ix
23
proceedings and not seek to be impleaded as party
respondents in this proceeding.
10. As noticed supra, the lis is
absorption of 4?” respondent, a deputationists’..__:’ir::p*toVVi’theV_’:’ ‘
services of the BBMP, a decisioniovtere which
require the presence of theapplicants for ,coIi1piet’e ‘V
and final decision on the qi;iesti.ons V”invo1ved*,pin the
proceeding. It is e1sevvhere’xsaid -.tha’t_a person to be
joined must be one wh_o,s:eV..presenee,Vdisifnecessary as a
party. Having: facts “and—vacircurnstances of
the case, -the are neither necessary nor
proper parties toVVthisV.’pro”ceedings.
View of the order rejecting Misc.W.
WJ12195/O9 does not survive for
V V’ consideration and is, rejected. .,
sd/~
moefi