High Court Kerala High Court

Eranhikendavida Raju @ Rajesh vs State Of Kerala on 21 August, 2009

Kerala High Court
Eranhikendavida Raju @ Rajesh vs State Of Kerala on 21 August, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 4718 of 2009()


1. ERANHIKENDAVIDA RAJU @ RAJESH,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.BINOY RAM

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :21/08/2009

 O R D E R
                        K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                     ---------------------------
                      B.A. No. 4718 of 2009
                ------------------------------------
             Dated this the 21st day of August, 2009

                            O R D E R

This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is accused No.3 in

Crime No.544/2008 of Panoor Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under

Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 326 and 307 read with Section 149

of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The date of incident was on 30/12/2008. The petitioner

could be arrested only on 10/7/2009. The wound certificate in

respect of the injured in the case would disclose that he had

sustained ten incised wounds and fracture and another injury

which resulted “near amputation of the left leg”. It is submitted

by the learned Public Prosecutor that left leg of the victim was

amputated. The investigation is not completed and all the other

accused persons have not been arrested.

4. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that if

the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, it would seriously

affect the proper investigation of the case. It is also pointed out

B.A. No. 4718/2009
Page numbers

that the area within the panoor Police Station limits is a sensitive

area. The crimes on account of political rivalry are on the high

side in the jurisdiction of Panoor Police Station, according to the

learned Public Prosecutor.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, I do not think that it is proper to release the petitioner on

bail at this stage.

The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

scm