High Court Karnataka High Court

Eshwara S/O. Vasappa Gowda vs The State Of Karnataka By Malur … on 17 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Eshwara S/O. Vasappa Gowda vs The State Of Karnataka By Malur … on 17 March, 2009
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj)
 

I

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALojREf'i,s«_,,:

DATED THIS THE 17m my OF MARCH 2099     3

BEFORE .w-,

THE HON'BLE MR. RD. DINAKARAIZV, 

CRL.P.NO.935i{.@___

BETWEEN:

Eshwara

S / o Vasappa Gowda
Occ: Agriculture,

R/o Agasara Kappa, _
Taiuka Thirthahalli, H _
District Shimoga.  3

V H _  «-- ..i°ET1T1oNER
(BY SRIRE.D:EsHEANi1>E_,V_iH3v,)1'"~.____ _ '
AND: A it  

The State of .Ka.rnatéika.:iby'~ 

Malnr Police: 

 ,  _   ..RESPONDENT
(BY SE: BAS:'iXf£a«E§AtIit'I§A"Pv,EDDY, GA)

Thisfietition is filed under Section 439 CrPC

 to "enlaufgev the petitioner on bail in S.C.NO. 104/ 2008
...o'n,.the.,.fi1e of the Sessions Judge, Shirnoga for the offences

p_1i11ishab1e_ under Sections 504, 111, 323, 324, 307 read with

 sgction 3,4 5:? IPC.

  '  . ,t_1*ie 'court made the following:

  Criminal Petition coming on for orders, this day,





ORDER

Heard.

2. The Petitioner is arrested for t1:Ieiioffen_ces
under Sections 504, 111, 323, 324, 30r1′::eé.§1t§iwith’%’si§¢acnii
of IPC. According to the learned
over and the charge-sheet ltheflease is

committed for trial.

3. Considerifig i:the’V’feicts”ai;xl”cjrctimstances of the case,
the petitioner”lslhallfiae on hbaia on his executing a

bond for a suit; of.Rs.~ Ten Thousand) with L

two sureties _veach’*foi’ rah.’-lilcestiin to the satisfaction of the
jurisdictiorijal Court, su’ojle’C”t’to the following conditions.

all’ report before the concerned
ju.risidiotio}itjale:’VCourt where the case is pending, on

V of the first week of every month at

_1V() aim’ “and thereafter, shall also make himself
jl.”Vi.A’ar2_ai;’able before the respondent as and when

ifequired.

3
b. Petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional

limits without prior permission.

c. Petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses. .

any manner interfere with or goutlhobstlacle

investigation.

d. Breach of any one of the’=aEove corwiitiovtzs
entitle the prosecution tor-“mop-e””-»this ‘Court-‘ylfor
cancellation of the bail firartted.’ ; ‘4 V A

i. 1

512:3/~
V :=7~,1mt; ,3
……:,.’_ __s¢__r___’_}:,._k_C’,J