High Court Kerala High Court

Faisal vs Jijesh on 21 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
Faisal vs Jijesh on 21 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1046 of 2009()


1. FAISAL, S/O.MOIDU, AGED 24 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. JIJESH, S/O.NANU, KOLADATHIL VEEDU,
                       ...       Respondent

2. M.K.SATHYAN, S/O.ANDI, MULLAN KUNIYIL

3. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., BRANCH

                For Petitioner  :SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL

                For Respondent  :SRI.RAJAN P.KALIYATH B/O

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :21/12/2009

 O R D E R
                      M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
                   ...........................................
                  M.A.C.A.No.1046 OF 2009
                  .............................................
          Dated this the 21st day of December, 2009

                         J U D G M E N T

This is an appeal preferred against the award of the

Claims Tribunal, Vadakara in OP(MV)No.642/2003. The

claimant, a pillion rider, sustained injuries in a road accident

and the Tribunal has awarded him a compensation of

Rs.33,000/=. The Tribunal accepted the contention of the

insurance company regarding its liability and exonerated

the insurance company from the liability. It is against that

decision, the claimant has come up in appeal.

2. Admittedly the vehicle is covered by a package policy.

The terms and conditions of the package policy cover the risk

of persons carried in a motor vehicle other than for hire or

reward. This clause came up for consideration before two

Division Benches of this Court in New India Assurance Co.

Ltd.v. Hydrose (2008 (3) KLT 778)and Mathew v. Shaji

Mathew (2009 (3)KLT 813). In both these cases, the Division

Benches had made it very clear that as the terms and

conditions of the policy cover the risk of persons carried in

: 2 :
M.A.C.A.No.1046 OF 2009

a motor vehicle, no additional premium is necessary. Over and

above this, by a circular dated 16.11.2009, the Insurance

Regulatory and Development Authority had also clarified that

the person carried in a motor cycle as a pillion rider is

covered by the terms and conditions of the standard motor

package policy. So, in the light of the above decisions and

the clarificatory order, the insurance company is bound to

pay the amount and therefore, exoneration of the insurance

company from the liability is incorrect and is liable to be set

aside and I do so. The insurance company is made liable.

3. In the result, the MACA is allowed and the award of

the Tribunal exonerating the insurance company from the

liability is set aside and it is made liable to pay the amount.

The insurance company shall deposit the amount within a

period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment.

Disposed of accordingly.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE

cl

: 3 :
M.A.C.A.No.1046 OF 2009