Faiyaz Ahmad &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 1 September, 2010

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                           CWJC No.14233 of 2008
                  1. FAIYAZ AHMAD, S/O MD.AFAK HUSSAIN, R/O
                  VILLAGE-DAPARKHA, P.S.-TRIVENIGANJ, DISTRICT-
                  SUPAUL.
                  2. KUMAR KRISHNA BIMAL, S/O SHRI JAY KRISHAN
                  PASWAN, R/O VILLAGE-RAGHUNATHPUR SOUTH, P.S.-
                  BHARGAMA, DISTRICT-ARARIA.
                  3. MURARI KUMAR, S/O MAHADEV YADAV, R/O
                  VILLAGE-HARINAHA (PARAYPATI), P.S.-JADIYA,
                  DISTRICT-SUPAUL.
                  4. DROPADI KUMARI, W/O SRI ARUN KUMAR YADAV,
                  R/O VILLAGE-RAGHUNATHPUR NORTH, P.S.-
                  BHARGAMA, DISTRICT-ARARIA. ...............PETITIONERS.
                                   Versus
                  1. THE STATE OF BIHAR.
                  2. THE SECRETARY, PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION
                  DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA.
                  3. THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
                  DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA.
                  4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ARARIA.
                  5. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ARARIA.
                  6. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, ARARIA.
                  7. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,
                  DISTRICT-ARARIA.
                  8. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER-CUM-
                  APPELLATE AUTHORITY, BLOCK-BHARGAMA,
                  DISTRICT-ARARIA.
                  9. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER,
                  BHARGAMA BLOCK, DISTRICT-ARARIA.
                  10.THE MUKHIYA, RAGHUNATHPUR SOUGH GRAM
                  PANCHAYAT, P.S.-BHARGAMA, DISTRICT-ARARIA.
                  11.THE SECRETARY, RAGHUNATHPUR SOUTH GRAM
                  PANCHAYAT, P.S.-BHARGAMA, DISTRICT-ARARIA.
                                             ..................RESPONDENTS.
                                -----------

5 01.09.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners

submits that the petitioners have already

filed a separate writ application in which

the relief prayed for in this writ

application has also been prayed. Therefore,

he seeks permission to withdraw this

application.

2

Permission is granted. This

application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Arvind/                     ( J. N. Singh, J.)