High Court Karnataka High Court

Fakeerappa S/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Fakeerappa S/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & A.S.Pachhapure
EN THE agga CGUR? 93 ;gKxé$A§gw >:"5f"

ciagngr BENCH AT GULBéR§& gV'H

BATES THIS THE 1$"'§AY gr ?§§R§a§?'2ée9,_=; 

yxgggmwz'

 

Tfifi fiQN'ELE MR. 3US:gCE_v.G;-éaafififiir
é§pf='

TEE BG§'BLE MR.-Jusiécs Aggfijégsaagpufig

 

w;§§§;;a§E@§Z

8£T@EEN:

L. Yakeerapéa, .
S/0. Durugagga,  
figez §3vy@ars;""

5, Ea§3fima;"A &
' %fQ;aF&kéera§pa,

£gég.éS_yg3rs,_»

Gc$:=Hou3eh3§ég

Vfl 3..Chan@amma,'"

.u'@fe. late Bheemagga,
'%g@: 30 gaazg,

"'."QC:: Haufiehaid,

.§éH"SrL§evi,

 *§f§$ Eheemapga,
"u%ge: 13 yaara,

V "§. Durgappa,

S50. Eheemappa,
Ag&: :1 yaazsg

APE§éL=§qg:a29z 9? 29%? AMVL



 

é. Z Saiinqamma,
. Bheamap§a,
9 years,

7. fihandru, ,~w-
SEQ. Eheamappa, j _ V
Age: ? ycarfi, ". [T*;

 

Rppekiant NQ3.4 tg ? are the r'QGr3;Hrep. _
by nazt friend and aaturai "guar§iaé<_E
mother i.e., aypgiiant $9.3. *_.li are.
556. Jangamarahaii: vr.§ii$a§é; " "figstt '
fiaiapuz, Tq: Manvi, Dist; * V'

1..

I

 

Sr Basavaxaj R.Ma:b iQr_ b V _
S: ChandrashekarjP.?a:;;{gfidv;};'

§By 1.
1.

:. Venkoba,

Sis. Haaumappa,

Age: 33 yaars,'

Drive: cf Tract-r §
'iv

Rf§."§ad§3iadinni Vi
r~.:

?q:=fiafivi, Q$3t? aa'

F
('.3
:7.'

E; SharafiegQg§§} " V

:L3fo. Han3maa$g¢§£a Mai; ?atii,

fflwner of T5a§i0:"&nfi
4T:a:iez No.Kag35x?, 25? &
§f§} 3afi§&marah&lli viigaa
7?®st: fiai&pu:, Tq: Mamvi,

",b:3t;'R3iafiur.

*g_§. Tfiévfiaééger,

1'=Umit@d Endia Enfiurance C0», Ltd.§
LgSidhanu:, Di5t: Raichug. M £33?

1%? Sri. §u:uraj Seghi, id?" for RE & E53

E51. R.V.Nadagcuda, Rdv. for R3.§



 

The petitionerg are the father, mother, wiie and cniiaxen
of deceased Eheemayga. it is averrea 3n the c%é;& petition
that on 82.12.2802 a{ anon: "$.50 p.m. a@Q3é$§@ Efiéemappa
was going by walk 0n the Left side 9% th@mf§§a fié@%'§fié%pga
stané at Masai, at that tima Xekfibhuefifi %o;i«§§fi§h§£:§;n@
th% Tractor with Traiiar in Q gagb fin? nefigfiqenz fiéfifiég figd

dasfied tg Bheemagpa reSuit:n§,:he fatal inju§iéé"t0 him and

succumbed :0 the injuries at t§e°3fi@:. Tag ciaimants baiaq

dependants upon the incéme-efi_fihe'céG§a3ed figed the ciaim

..\

getitian, "éééKihg' ééfigémfiaticwi of Rs.6,§§,SSfl--Gfi Exam the
raspandenté,
fiuti;eT was 'i3s§ea ta the saspenaeats. Raapsndeai

ifiofi hag fii&fi,cQun:er avarring that the accidgat accurred

dué,§Q tn3 §egLiggnce an thé part or ifié decaased fiimseii.

"wffie de¢easafiL§uddeaiy came and cantactea the véhicié and

TFthe,occ1dunt GCC§£X@d aad tée acaidant was get due ta the

'":a3fiVafid.2@gi:qe§i Qrivimq ai tha Tractax and Eragier 33

 }§li&q§d ifi Eée ciazm §@tiiiG§ aafl tha Eegice have fiiad a

V'=, fais@ cfiazga ghee: 3g3:nsi raspandext §o,z. Respsnaent

*N§.1 aéagtea the ahjéctisn stateman: Eiiéfi, by respondent

R@.2. Respanfient M@.3~§nss:a2ca Cempany iiiéd cauntaz,

\9fi%



Senying tha avermen: made in the petiuien regarding the

manner of the accidant and Eartha: averted that T  7%uantum

 

0: Compensation awarded4 :3 excessive and; fespdsdefit  N0.1

was not hoiding a valid driving license at the iime7Qi'tfig

accident. It is aiso ave::@d that the claim pétition is

iilea wiih sale inteaticn to fia;n s§mpathy,of"th&*C0u:t and

ts achieve cemgensatian thsuqh aha Tractor and the Trailer

0: the 3m respandant W33 flotLinv9Eved in the accidant.

3. The Eribufia; égamédgtnéfliaiiowinq issueat

1} W§,th$r th§%pet;t;§fie§s prove that the death

0: Ehsémagpa has Qccurred in fifl accident which
gteet p§ace"5n G2.l2.2GGZ at absut ?.5Q a.m. an
'"S§n§naaur4Eifl§asugur raafi, 3&5: old figswgtand

*»_a: fia$ki_§ue is the rash and nagizqent driving

 

¢i ?;aCt¢r and ?:a1ier Ns.K%.36.T.2'? aad Z58

%y_ii3;dri¥er/resgondent No.1?

?} Ehether ifie petitisners are antitiad ta

u*$empea3atian? if 33, how mgch ané ifem wfiam?

'§. On behagi ofi the siaimanta, tfie 2§Q§fi@E' 0: tgé

"~_ éeceased as ?.fial :né an ayawitfiags as ?.fi.2 weze examined

*an§ got mazked ifie decumeats Exs.P1 to E. fin Sakai: ai the

\5Q%



raspendents, no orai evidence was ad§uced.{  Héw@fié:;,cGpy
Qf the Enauzaace Paiicy amd Qzivinq iic@n§e.di':@3péndé3t
No.1 was marked. The Tribufiai waiter  densiQe§inq {ha

materiai on recerd and assessing evidencé~aaau$ed b§;tne
§ar:i9s, angwered both the is§ués ix éaqézjve and dismigsed

the claim petitiom an§.haid fiha%=:§ough tfie claimants wouid

have enfiitied for compensatién bf &s;s;§4,a33~a@, in View
6f the §indingT_cg 3iSSQe':fi§.§_ fi@ifiifiQ that the Ciaimantg

fiave faiied to firofie the ra@h'ahfi.negiiqent driving of tée

Tractar abd Wfiéiiefi by ,it3 _drivar, dismissed the claim
p@titiQm.  Béi§§.aQqrié%é& by th@ Judgment and Award gated
G3.}G.2fi§@, dismgssing. éhe claim petitian the ciaimantg

fiave p:&E%rfe@ thi§'amfi€a;.

A¢S,g 'E6 he?§ heard the Learned csunfieg agfiearinq fez

'vtha ap§@iian:s afid far the raspandenta.

', 6», H§%imq regard ta the conteniiofls uraefi, the points

" t:hai'a:1se :9: Cu! determinaticn in this agfiaai arég

gm;

whether tfia Jfidgment and Awazfi of the
Tribasai {flat {fie ciaimamts have faiied to

grave that the accident occurred flue to ifie

Vix./FL'



his évidence bafore the Tribufiai that Bheemagpg was qeinq
by walk and the Tractor and ifalier came §§§§ pan1nd in
rash and negligent manner and dashed Bheem§§§§gg§é;%*;esuit
Bheemappa sustained bieedinq infiur:es. wH§ fi#$:a;$§-sgagad

that the Pciice have recorded his 3t$teménfi;;§ogy or the

 

cfiarqe sheet is at Ex.P3. »?,%.24fiyyanqonfi; éitéfi av Q.W.;¢
in tfie Charge sheet. Natfiin§~ has ~béem7 eggcitad in the

croa$~examination 0: ?;%.2Ito'disfieiieve E13 avidence that

fie is an eyewitness t5 the ¢nbi§én§ a5 his statement hag

been recbréeé {in 7th@ u¢rimifiéi' C&S@. On behalf of the

Eespondefits} the dfiver or the Tzactor and Trailer has 50:

bean ex3miné§, -The Qwfiaf has mat baen examined ané no era;

xaygéefiffivifi addgcad gm behalf of Eng zésponfiemts. Hswever,

'::'is_§on€en§é§ by fihé ieazfied QOUflS@i appeazifig far the

respefidentsffihat the reqistratien gumber 03 the ?ra$tGz and

Traiiei' £3 "£0: mentiened by' §.w.z aad. in ta% abgence of

"Amgntignimg GE the registratian numE@:' GE" iha Tractar and

3:31:95, the eviéanae 0: P.%.2 15 net tzmthfui and

 r@iiabi€. There 15 EM} merit ix: 53$ coateatzsn as ii; :5

""£@ii sattied téat 33 ?.W.Z was examiaed bgicze the C0urt an

1b.@J.£@G§, wfiereas the acc;$e§t Qccgrrefi on $£.15.£§§Z and





 

16

the quastion as ta whether the charq@3"s$§§§§ fia3 be@&
propeziy iiied and as to whether it is §§;;@La@d déééy if
anyT in tiling tha compgaini §§;é_";Q _béA §@fi@i §§ ?pYi_i@@
Crimifiai Ceurt fer considegifiq Engigase Q5 the grfléagutfion
befsra it and it is not spam gb thé ?§ihfifiéifl£é go ifité tha
qaestion as to whethgg :fié c$é:ge fléheet} is filed in
accordance with law  a§d  w§%gflé#f fit' hag iflS§if@d tfié
comfidance of $§é.firi§fifié;§ i§§§ §G%fi$énts praduced befere
the T:ibuna;~%§§i%fii$ §@_¢QrfiQ$§f$%e the evidence of the

eyewitnes'é}"T":fiii 3L»é7'3"G2<'é::mi:2Qd"bérom we 'Z{r:j_i3u!1a.i zeqaraina

the fiact, thai'"€Ee .$Cg£fiéfit Qccurred due to ragh and

neq:iqam:"gf:§inqV=3: "$59" genicia and when ihé reasons

asaigfied by ihé.$:ibqn3i is no: at aii cengzstenz and im

ufiiew Q£.:%e evifienQ§_of P.%.2 and the dscuménts got marked

*i.a;,3 cogy  é£_ tha FIR ;nx.P:}, copy 95 tfie Complaint

W"'

i

6

X.725[v,§Q§§ TQf tha chargé gheet {Ex.?3§, copyT of ihe

vV§an¢h§fiamaH {g;;?é} anfi cop' of EM?" xegort iEx.P5} it is

clear théfix thé evifi@nce 9% ?.%.2 is Cazrcbcrazed by the

uV§a;d:30cQ&ent3 and iurihez ragpondamt fiG3.1 and E &&v% fiat

_§i§@fitQd taat {ha accidaai Oflcufiéd dag fie the rash anv

'"aa§iigent fi$i¥1nq. Thaugh according to téém tfia accideaa

<'

\J}%
'fix'?



 

12

the age 0: {ha daceagefl Bheemappa at 45 y§a:§L§$§ come ts
aha conCiu3ion that tfie Loss '?fiV¢.a§@%#d§#§%a  at
Rs.3;6§¢GGG-GS and has awarded:§$Lifi;$fi$~$Q %Q§§fi@§ kegs §f
estate, R3.f:_{},SOi'J-GU towgyds - énd
affestion, Rs.lQ,U0O~G0 tofiagds c§fisQr:1§m %5fi'%s.§;G@G~G@
towards iunerai eXP®$Sfi$ anfi"h$§-éfifiessédvthat the ciaimant
would Ema entitled ix: i§§ai,§@fi§§fi§§fiifin <fi? Rs.3,94,DQG~Q0

with interest at_.6%u' ;ag ffiom 3the' date 0f the claim

    

petitiea tiii'~:;Q ;§ate'ppfg'Qayment and apportianed th@
¢0mpen3atiéfi*a$Qum5f' fl;§:mafi€W§o.j being the wiie wouifi be
entitled {@'thG Cé&péf3&£iUfi awarded t$wards canaerzium and
3§% cf the Mcémpéasafigan awarded ander other headg.

CiaimanL»$o3.é»§O"7 béing tha ahiiaren of the éeceased ara

,"é§titieé;§o'§@% ea¢fi"Gi ihe tatai compensation awarded aha

Ciaxméfit fiésfi and 2 being tfie fiarents are entitied to the

bal3nc§7 am@fint3Vaf 15% éaah. The amomnt payable ta the

fiiaimaétsw 4' is "? shag}. be deposited in any Natianaiizéd

* §afik giefig with accrueé interest tawazds tfie minar sfiildren

*iI@,;_ éiaimant Nés.é ta "? with iibarty' ts ciaimafit %0.3

'*_i§e.g tme methgz to vfithfiraw the iaterast accrued an tha

"5aid depsgit g@:i0d:C&iiy. Gut 3f the camfiensation §ayabi@



 

34

ameufit 0: CGfl§€fi8&ElGfi shaii be aepcsgtea by :he ifisurance

Camgamy, within 2 msnths from taday.

s§,/%-3'   SI %  

1



-    

KSm*