High Court Kerala High Court

Fast And Safe Transports Pvt.Ltd vs Excise Inspector on 21 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
Fast And Safe Transports Pvt.Ltd vs Excise Inspector on 21 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 24368 of 2008(A)


1. FAST AND SAFE TRANSPORTS PVT.LTD.,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. RAJARAM DNYANOBA, SREERAM COMPOUND,

                        Vs



1. EXCISE INSPECTOR, MANJESWAR EXCISE
                       ...       Respondent

2. JALARAM & CO., SHOP NO.106,

3. KESAR AGENCIES, KOTTAPARAMBU,

4. ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :21/08/2008

 O R D E R
                            ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

                         ===============
                     W.P.(C) NO. 24368 OF 2008 A
                    ====================

                Dated this the 21st day of August, 2008

                              J U D G M E N T

A truck bearing Regn.No.KA-22A/4906 owned by the 2nd petitioner

and hired by the first petitioner has been detained by the 1st respondent

on the ground that one of the consignments in the truck contained 25

packets of rectified spirit. In this writ petition, what is mainly prayed for is

that the remaining consignments belonging to the other customers of the

1st petitioner have nothing to do with the detention in the aforesaid

consignment and therefore should be released.

2. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader submits

that other consignments were used for hiding the packets containing

rectified spirit and therefore all those consignments have also been

detained and produced before the 4th respondent, the authorised officer

for proceeding under Section 67B. It is stated that the authorised officer

has already initiated proceedings under Section 67B of the Abkari Act.

3. Now that the matter is pending before the 4th respondent,

being the authorised officer under Section 67B, and as these consignments

belong to third parties and especially in view of the claims now made by

WPC 24368/08
:2 :

the customers on the petitioner, it is essential that the authorised officer

finalise the proceedings on an expeditious basis.

4. Therefore, I direct that the 4th respondent shall finalise the

proceedings as expeditiously as possible.

5. It will also be open to the petitioner to move the 4th

respondent, for finalising the proceedings on an expeditious basis and also

to consider the request of the petitioner for interim release of the

consignments and also the truck in question.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp