High Court Kerala High Court

Fathima Beevi vs The State Election Commission For … on 26 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
Fathima Beevi vs The State Election Commission For … on 26 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32639 of 2010(D)


1. FATHIMA BEEVI,KAYAKKANDI HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. K.P.ABDUL RAZACK,EDAKKOTTUMMAL HOUSE,
3. DEVI,AMBALAKKANDI,MOILOTHARA PO,
4. SHANI NADUKANEEMMAL,NADUKANEEMMAL HOUSE,
5. KOORARA BINDU,KOORAREMMAL HOUSE,
6. NAMITHA,KANATHIL HOUSE,MARUTHONKARA PO,
7. SREEJITH,KUNNATHUCHALIL HOUSE,
8. K.J.SEBASTIAN,KUNNIPPARAMBIL HOUSE,
9. JOSE,PUTHUKULANGARA,PASUKKADAVU PO,
10. JEEVANS,KONUKUZHIYIL HOUSE,
11. SANTHOSH,VATTAKKANDI HOUSE,
12. SARADA,PATTYATT HOUSE,
13. KILAYIL RAVEENDRAN,KILAYIL HOUSE,
14. MUBARAK,EDATHIL HOUSE,

                        Vs



1. THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION FOR THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE,

3. THE RETURNING OFFICER,G-17,MARUTHONKARA,

4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

9. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,'

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.P.JACOB

                For Respondent  :SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMM

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI

 Dated :26/10/2010

 O R D E R
            K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.
            -----------------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C) No.32639 of 2010
                   -----------------------------------
         Dated this the 26th day of October 2010


                         J U D G M E N T

Petitioners have approached this Court seeking the

following reliefs :-

“i. Issue a writ of mandamus or other writ or order

directing the respondents to act upon Ext.P1 to P4

ensuring law and order situation properly enabling the

voters to reach the polling station and to exercise where

votes peacefully without any obstruction of hindrance in

whatsoever manner.

ii. Direct the respondents to deploy necessary police

officials giving adequate police protection to the voters,

candidate and authorized agents ensuring peaceful

conduct of the election in Ward No.1 to 14 of

Maruthonkara Grama Panchayath by acting upon Ext.P1

to P4.

iii. Direct the respondents 1 to 3 to allow necessary

video graph in and around the polling booths where the

W.P.(C) No.32639 of 2010

-: 2 :-

votes are being polled in connection with the election of

the petitioners as candidates in Ward No.1 to 14 in the

Maruthonkara Grama Panchayath ensuring that

impersonation and other election offences are not being

allowed to commit in whatsoever manner.”

2. The case of the petitioners in brief as follows:-

Petitioners are candidates from Ward No.1 to 14

of the G 17 Maruthonkara Grama Panchayath. From 2008

onwards political rivalry exists in respect of Maruthonkara

Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. in that area. It is stated that

large scale violence and massive attacks were done at the

instance of LDF against UDF persons from the very

inception of the declaration of election and filing of

nomination papers. They submit that for the last several

years political rivalry exist in that area and hence the office

bearers of the UDF alliance as well as the petitioners

submitted Exts.P1 to P4 petitions before the authorities.

3. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioners,

the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the

Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3 and the learned Government

W.P.(C) No.32639 of 2010

-: 3 :-

Pleader on behalf of the Respondent Nos.4 to 7.

4. The learned Standing Counsel appearing on

behalf of the Commission submits that the State Election

Commission has issued a proceedings dated 26.10.2010

addressed to the Director General of Police to deploy police

force in that area and to see that the District Collector takes

steps for arranging of videography. The learned Standing

Counsel would also submit that as far as the request for

videography made by the petitioners is concerned, that will

be allowed. [Ofcourse, the petitioners will have to meet the

expense of the videography.]

5. The learned Government Pleader would submit

that, the request of the Commissioner will be complied with

and sufficient police force will be deployed so that the

election is held in a safe and fair manner. The learned

Government Pleader would also submit that there will be

general police patrolling done so as to ensure that the

polling is conducted in a smooth manner.

W.P.(C) No.32639 of 2010

-: 4 :-

We record these submissions and dispose of this

writ petition in the above manner. Petitioners shall produce

a copy of this judgment before the District Collector for

proper compliance.

K.M.JOSEPH,
JUDGE.

M.C.HARI RANI,
JUDGE.

Jvt