IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
CRP No. 1110 of 2004()
1. FATHIMA, W/O. LATE ALAVI HAJI.
... Petitioner
2. PATHUMMA.
3. KHADEEJA UMMA.
4. VEERAN.
5. MAMMUNNY.
Vs
1. SREEDHARAN, S/O. PONNAN,
... Respondent
2. UMMACHU.
3. KUNJIRUMMA.
4. THITHUNNI.
5. MOITHEEN.
6. NABEESA.
7. HANEEFA.
For Petitioner :SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH
For Respondent :SRI.KRISHNA PRASAD. S
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN
Dated :14/12/2007
O R D E R
K.T. SANKARAN, J.
...................................................................................
C.R.P. No. 1110 OF 2004
...................................................................................
Dated this the 14th December, 2007
O R D E R
The challenge in this Revision is against the order dated 5th August, 2004 in
E.P.No.412 of 2002 in O.S.No. 139 of 1979 on the file of the court of the Munsiff,
Ottappalam. By the impugned order, the court below held that the Execution Petition
is maintainable and that it will be proceeded with for realisation of the amounts due.
There is no case for the revision petitioners that the amounts are not due. Though the
revision petitioners have filed an appeal against the decree, the appellate court has not
granted any stay. Therefore, no interference is called for in the order.
2. The learned counsel for the revisions petitioners submits that the petitioners
may be granted a short time to pay off the decree amount. In the facts and
circumstances, two months’ time is granted to pay off the decree amount.
The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as above.
K.T. SANKARAN,
JUDGE.
lk