IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 31109 of 2007(C)
1. FATHIMABEEVI, W/O. MUHAMMED KUNJU,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE TAHSILDAR (R.R.),
... Respondent
2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
3. THE FEDERAL BANK,
For Petitioner :SRI.C.A.CHACKO
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI
Dated :19/10/2007
O R D E R
V. GIRI ,J.
-------------------------------
WP(C).NO.31109 of 2007
---------------------------------
Dated this the 19th day of October, 2007
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P1 notice under
the Revenue Recovery Act, showing that the petitioner’s
son Hashim has defaulted the loan amount and it is being
enforced, as against the petitioner, and the movable
assets belonging to her kept in her house. In my view,
the claim made by the petitioner should be by way of a
claim petition under the Revenue Recovery Act. The
petitioner has detailed her grievances under Ext.P3.
2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, after
hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed
of directing the first respondent to look into Ext.P3,
consider the claim of the petitioner as regards the title to
the movables which are kept in her house and take a
decision thereon, within a period of six weeks from the
W.P.(C)31109/2007 -2-
date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till a decision is
taken on Ext.P3, enforcement of Ext.P1 shall be kept in
abeyance, insofar as the petitioner and the assets kept by
her in her house are concerned.
V. GIRI, JUDGE
css/