1 W1'. I (>934/{)7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 23% DAY OF NOVEMBER 2009
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE H.N.N_A.GAMOHAN' "
WRIT PETETEON NO:16984/2G:QZ(;;'EiAREAS).V
BETWEEN:
1 G DSREENIVASA GOW.__DA
S/O CHANDRAGiRE D(3L!;EG'Q\l\«f_D.A"=f'» _
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS A * " _ _
2 MURALIDHARASTO 1j'VEE:$j':VAsAGD\}VDA
AGED ABQt._:_T 3;:2»T'Y:EA+*«:s';_
PETv§T!ONE'RSVT_&'«2 ARE.__ 1 T
RESIDENCE OF~.'GQPAL=A_P'U_RA VELALGE
I\/iAND'.fA 'TALUK 3.. DnsT..R':c'T
. . I ...RET:T:oz\2ERs
- V.(__By s;_m~§:.::e<Av'.JA NAG"/&RAJ«,«vAdv., FOR
I\/':.STV'APP»A=&'T..AN MAE-IADEVASWAMY)
R1 RT":-IE"{:3E.-HET: EXECUTEVE OFFICER
MA?'~1VD7H'A TALUK PANCHAYATH
" : RMANDYA
'DDRALARURA GRAMA PANCHAYATH
% GOPALAPURA, MANDYA TALUK
MANDYA DESTRICT
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
#*"}'
2 WP. I (3'}?%-I/()7
3 A VENKATAPPA S/O G ANNEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/O GOPALAPURA VILLAGE
I\/IANDYA TALUK, I\/IANDYA DISTRICT.
SINCE DECEASED BY LR$:
(a) KRISHNAPPA s/0 vENK.ATAPEA,I"-._
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
(b) SAVITi--IRAI\/I1\/iA,'\__/If/O vEI$;I:A, ~--
AGED ABOUT SSEEARSI. 'A
(0) UMESH,S/O vENI<ATAPPA',:"
AGED ABOUT 34%'-EAEi~S§ --. _ '
Id) ASWPITH/3I1ID'7SI¥i)..\I7'EI\IKATA:.I5PAI;.I "
I AGED A._E30"U'T'..__32YEARS."_ A
(e) AS: edki-A V'\/E'NKATAPP~.A.--,v
AGED 'A..E5QD'T%2ayEAF2Cs._--
ALL. AR_E'R/0' G_O'I-EA-EDA':-3'.IJ'RA VILLAGE,
¥\/IANDY/~\,TAI_UK.._ NI.AN».D);"A DISTRICT.
.»AIgnENDED As?-ER coum ORDER
-QATED H-..1no.2oo9."' *****
A FIESPONDENTS
(EI}r_ Adx/., FOR R1 & R2;
sn.I<LEMPEGGwIDA, Adv., FOR
_ sn.I<:v.NAF:AS:MHAN,Adm, FOR R3(b)tG(e))
' ._ I TII'iIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 8: 227
GOFV ITHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R1,
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, I\/IANDYA TO, PANCHAYATH,
'=MA--I\IDYA DT. 19.7.2007 VIDE ANNEXJ. AND DISIVIISS TI-IE
_ VAPF'EAI_ FILED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT.
a-»-»
3 W.]’. |t3′}84/ii”?
THJS WRIT PETITEON COMING ON FOR Pi3tEL!Ml?€i;5i’RY
HEARING N ‘B’ GROUP THJS DAY, THE COURT
FOt.LOW!NG:~ it
The 2″” respondent — Gopaiapura Garanriar i?ianc»ha’yat”t:
a notice on 23.052007′ to the 3″‘ respondenit’directing’V:to}re«mQve a
shed put up by him encroaching aiiieportion of.’t’hei_:pubiei}c road.
Aggrieved by this notice, the res_pon_dent.._ii!..e”d~an appeal before
the 15′ respondent andthe same.vcametto:be’.ia!|io\rJed’V'”on 19.07.2007
as per Annexure — ice this -iryrit petition.’ ”
2. on bothrrthfe side and perused the
entire writ papers. V V’
3. H in the irnpudned order at Annexure ~ 3, it is stated that
Q1.’e'[\hCLJgh~’:,IHeJ?t$’1ENS’ noiecvorfipiaints by the pubtic against the 3″‘
re’spo’ndent.:the~i2″‘?: respondent — Grarna Panchayath issued the
_ notice’toieeremoyeilthie construction put up by hirn. This is factuaiiy
viii’-«.._.uin’correct. Grama Panchayath at the instance of the petitioners
other residents in the vicinity issued notice on 23.05.2007
regneove the unauthorized construction made by the 3″
A» “resepondent. Evert otherwise, the Grama Panchayath is entitted to
Qissax
4 we I (mi/m
initiate action whenever there is obstruction to a public road.
Secondty, in the impugned order, it is stated that there is-.__no
necessity of a road in front of the house of 3″‘ respondent.
respondent inspected the spot and without notice to ‘
and without hearing the affected parties, the..1_S_§ respioindeanit» piassewd
the impugned order. On this ground atone, the
iiabie to be quashed. Accordingly; t f’o_E.iowingv.t 2 V
h
ORDER”
2) The writ petition A–i4s”‘:i?erepy _
EE) date’dvv-‘:’§.O7.2007 passed by the
if Annexore — ‘J’ is hereby
quashed .ii’ i i
‘The rn’att–erLi_s___rereanded to the 13’ respondent for fresh
V in accordance with Eaw after providing an
to the petitioners and the respondent ¥\tos_2
3:,
V'”‘.C.)rdered accordingty.
Sd/~
JUDGE