IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Con.Case(C).No. 1393 of 2008(S)
1. G.LALITHA BHAI,AGED 54 YEARS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. DR.P.K.SUDARSANAN, AGED 50 YEARS,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :DR.K.P.SATHEESAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
Dated :26/09/2008
O R D E R
H.L. DATTU, C.J. & A.K. BASHEER, J.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Cont.Case ).No. 1393 of 2008-S
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Dated this the 26th day of September, 2008
Judgment
H.L. Dattu, C. J:
Inter alia alleging that the respondent herein has disobeyed the interim
orders issued by this Court in W.A.No.1255/2008 dated 24th June 2008, the 4th
respondent in the writ petition has presented this Contempt Petition.
2. This Court, while entertaining the writ appeal, had passed the following
interim oder:
“Notice. Interim stay as prayed for is granted
but salary for the period during which the 4th
respondent actually worked should be paid within one
month from today.”
3. After receipt of the interim orders passed by this Court, the respondent
has issued the letter dated 23/08/2008 to the complainant . In that he has stated as
under:
“As per the order first referred the Hon.High
Court ordered that the salary for the period during
which you have actually worked should be paid within
one month from 24/6/2008. As per the letter cited (2)
above, you have produced a statement showing the
salary received by you during the period you worked
and the balance to be received on the basis of pay
revision. As noted in our letter cited (3), your
COC.1393/2008. 2
statement itself is evidence for the fact that you were
paid salary for the period you actually worked. The
acquittance Register for the period also confirms
this.”
4. Having gone through the interim orders passed by this Court and the
reply of the respondent dated 23/08/2008, we are of he opinion that there is
substantial compliance with the interim orders and directions issued by this Court.
5. In that view of the matter, we need not take cognizance of this
Contempt Petition. Accordingly we dispose of the Contempt Petition for the
present.
Ordered accordingly.
H.L. DATTU
Chief Justice
A.K. BASHEER
Judge
an.