High Court Karnataka High Court

G Madhusudan vs The Dy Commr Chamarajanagar Dist on 12 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
G Madhusudan vs The Dy Commr Chamarajanagar Dist on 12 June, 2008
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy


Ill mm maxi mum or mmwraxa, ~
mrmn rms ms 12:: pm or % ‘ ” ‘ ‘

asmnm

ms nomsu: mt. Jusncm _ r%-pzmzm

_ – ~ m – —

1 G MAD;HU’=sUDA?H V _ V

39 YRS,., A. é ”

3/0 H S ‘c::oPi§;.ALR1sHNACHAR
mo DOOEENO ‘224«1,”‘V__CROSS,
BAsA~vE.=sHw1xRA~« _ ‘ _
ROAD,» Mvsonax % % ”

” PETITIONER
(By :«M/S~VAGDEVU_\wSSOCIATES as SRWEERESH B

:_’j ‘PATIL–.ADT.Vr’~,., ABSENT )

—-_–«-

% ‘ . _1 THE” 1:”: comma

‘ .. , LCHAMARAJANAGAR DIST
* V CHAMARAJANAGAR
VMYSORE

f :2, THE ASST COMMR

KOLLEGAL, CI-IAMARAJANAGAR
MYSORE

3 TI-IAHSILDAR
GUNDLUPET TAKUK ;

:W\

x.” J

\

Judge

CHAMARAJANAGAR DISFIRCT.

V

(Smt :AKKAMAHADEVI HCGP FOR in-:~:§’_%) *

THIS WRIT mrmon FILEi}.P’RAYING_TG ..E3ET’,ASIDE
THE ORDERS ma 9.10.93 AND 29;-11.99 mm: ANN,-is AND
A RESPECTIVELY or ,’:*:~;_E RESPECTIVE AUTHORITIES
DECLARING THEM AS V01)” AND rianam’ AND AS HAVING
NO LEGAL EFFICACY. T % . =

THIS PETIT-IQN’ Cf0MIN{.’x .,ON_~.._FO¥I: PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 13 GRGUF THI{~3_ DAY ‘l’_I-iE’Cf)’Ul’?T MADE THE
FoLLow1NG:, ” ‘

no representation for the
petitioxzgcxj. The; “p§§titia.r:)i1 for non prosecution.

55/!

V
‘-1