High Court Kerala High Court

G.N. Namboothiri vs State Of Kerala on 7 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
G.N. Namboothiri vs State Of Kerala on 7 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 30240 of 2007(Y)


1. G.N. NAMBOOTHIRI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,

3. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.J.HARIKUMAR

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :07/10/2008

 O R D E R
                          ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                         ===============
                    W.P.(C) NO. 30240 OF 2007 (Y)
                    ====================

                Dated this the 7th day of October, 2008

                              J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is the Secretary of Parent Teachers Association,

Government Sanskrit College, Trivandrum. The prayer sought in this writ

petition are to direct the 2nd respondent to take immediate steps to fill up

the vacancy of teachers in Sanskrit (Vyakarana) Department on a

permanent basis. Even according to the Government, two vacancies are

available and these vacancies were reported to the PSC on 17/6/04.

These are reserved posts and the PSC has not advised any candidates. As

rightly pointed out by the learned Government Pleader, Ext.P5 ranklist was

published by the PSC on 31/12/2005 and it was therefore that they could

not make appointments otherwise than by advice of the PSC. But the

stand of the PSC is that the list is exhausted and it was therefore that they

could not advise candidates in response to the two vacancies that were

reported on 17/6/2004. If that be so, in order to make regular

appointment it is for the authorities to take fresh proceedings in the

matter.

2. Be that as it may, the grievance of the petitioner is presently

regarding the stalemate that is prevailing in the College. However, the

WPC 30240/07
:2 :

learned Government Pleader expressed helplessness in making even adhoc

arrangement referring to Ext.P4 judgment rendered by this court. In the

judgment, Para 4 reads as under.

The above submissions are recorded. Writ petition is
closed with a direction that respondent No.4 shall take
immediate appropriate steps to advise the candidates
and respondent No.1 shall fill up the vacancies without
any further delay. In the meanwhile, no adhoc
appointments shall be made.

3. The direction to advise candidates is with reference to Ext.P5

ranklist published and the rider that no adhoc arrangement shall be made

can only operate so long as the list remains. Now that the list has

exhausted, in my view, the rider in Ext.P4, prohibiting appointment on

adhoc basis cannot remain operative. It will be open to the authorities to

make adhoc appointments to take care of the interest of the students.

With this clarification and directing that necessary steps in this

behalf will be taken as expeditiously as possible, the writ petition is

disposed of.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp