High Court Kerala High Court

G.Rajan vs Authorised Officer on 6 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
G.Rajan vs Authorised Officer on 6 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 22276 of 2008(B)


1. G.RAJAN, S/O.GOPALAN, AGED 57 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. AUTHORISED OFFICER, UNION BANK OF INDIA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. BRANCH MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :06/08/2008

 O R D E R
                         S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                 ------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C)No.22276 OF 2008
              ----------------------------------------
                Dated this the 6th day of August, 2008

                             JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges proceedings under the

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

Enforcement of Security Interest Act, initiated by the respondents

against the petitioner, for recovery of loan amounts due from the

petitioner to the respondents. However, the petitioner now

confines his relief for a direction to the respondents to permit the

petitioner to pay off the amounts in instalments.

2. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing

for the bank who opposes the same.

Having heard both sides, I feel that some leniency can be

shown to the petitioner in the matter of payment of amounts in

instalments. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the

following directions:

The petitioner shall pay an amount of Rs.1 lakh within one

month from today. The balance amount shall be paid in five

equal monthly instalments starting from the 1st working day of

W.P.(c)No.22276/08 2

October 2008. Every subsequent instalment shall be paid on

the 1st working day of every succeeding month. If the

petitioner pays the above amounts without default, further

proceedings under the Act shall be kept in abeyance.

However, if the petitioner commits default in payment of either

the Rs.1 lakh or any of the subsequent instalments, it would be

open to the respondents to complete proceedings as now

initiated without having to issue any fresh notice or

proceedings in that regard.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd

W.P.(c)No.22276/08 3