IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
Dated the 12*} day ofMa1'ch 2009
1 B E F O R E :
THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE : VJAGANNATHAN
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 11177 I 200$.-{MVC}
BETVVEEN :
G.S.Si<:ida Ramaiah,
3/ 0 Chikka Patelappa,
Aged about 23 years, __ H
R/a S.M.GoIlaha}]i, ' j
Doddaballapura '§'a1uk,_V_ "
Baflgalere Rural' '
" ...Appc-zllant
Advocate. )
A N D :
1.
Cha;id,ra’
S / 0 éigishnappa, ‘ ~ ~~
; ‘Fig.3 No.’-4V3f’3. Raxlgamma Building,
” Ivi_u1iIf:shwaz”a.Temple, Gorugunte Palya,
Bmzgmore – 560 022.
V SQ”.!§*:tikatappa, Aged about 4′? years,
R-fa -N383, Kallappa Layout,
Axnmtha Halli, Sahakara Nagra (Post),
; Bangalore.
.’ The Qriental Insurance C0. I..td.,
rapt. by Managing Directer,
No.20, Jalahaiii Cross, Chokkasarldra,
Bangalore -~ 560 05?.
. . .Respond€:nt;s
{ By Sri Y.K.Sheshag’ri Rae, Advocate for R-3. )
_ Mistxeilaneous First Appeal filed under Seofion
173(1) of the M.V.Act against the judgment and
dated 17.12.2905 passed in MVC No. 4999/2Q{}”1lt()lIl’Vetl”if;
file of the 18*’! A-::ic11. Judge, Member, 4′
Small Causes, Metropolitan l” V
partly allowing the oiaixn petitidsjl
seeking enhancement of oo1:ap%e1″§.sa_§:ion.”* ._ ‘ I
This appeal cozfiilig. ox} this day, the
C{)UI’l1 delivered the follmifizig _ ‘V ‘
The by the quantum of
compensation by the M.A.C.’I’. in a sum
of Rs.33,f)GQl[ laheleained counsel for the appellant
that» fhe…..M«;A.C.T. failed to take note of the
gven by the doctor and moreover,
not cioing any work as of now after the
V Amount is also sought under the head of
A 5.’ expenses incurred by the claimant.
2: On the other hand, the learned counsel for R—3
Insurance Company argued that no document is
produced in proof of employment nor removal from
ie
5
The: award. is madified by allowixlg _
part thus. The enhanced amount iq ..
claimant.
eke/~