High Court Kerala High Court

G.Sajitha vs State Of Kerala on 28 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
G.Sajitha vs State Of Kerala on 28 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

LA.App..No. 337 of 2009()


1. G.SAJITHA, D/O K.P.GOPINATHAN NAIR,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. T.K.RAMANI,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM

 Dated :28/01/2010

 O R D E R
  PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.

             ````````````````````````````````
                  L.A.A. No. 337 of 2009
              ```````````````````````````````
         Dated this the 28th day of January, 2010

                    J U D G M E N T

Pius C. Kuriakose, J.

This appeal by the claimants pertains to

acquisition of land in Manakkadu village for the purpose

of construction of Thodupuzha by-pass pursuant to

Section 4(1) notification which was published on 12-06-

2002. As against the appellants’ claim of Rs.75,000/- per

cent, the Land Acquisition Officer awarded land value at

the rate of Rs.17,561/- per Are. The reference court, on

the basis of the evidence that came on record, re-fixed

the land value at Rs.32,530/- per cent.

2. Our attention is drawn by both sides to the

judgment of this Court in L.A.A.No.1355/2009, which was

a case pertaining to the same acquisition of property in

the same village. We notice that under that judgment this

Court has re-fixed the value of land under acquisition at

LAA.337/09
: 2 :

Rs.50,000/- per cent. Necessarily the above judgment

has to be followed and the market value of the land under

acquisition is to be re-fixed accordingly. Hence, allowing

the appeal we re-fix the value of land under acquisition at

Rs.50,000/- per cent. Needless to mention that the

appellants will be entitled for all statutory benefits on the

total enhanced compensation to which the appellants

become eligible by virtue of the re-fixation done in this

judgment.

The appeal is allowed as above but without any

order as to costs.

(PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)

(C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE)

aks