High Court Kerala High Court

G.Sasidharakurup vs The Executive Engineer on 16 January, 2009

Kerala High Court
G.Sasidharakurup vs The Executive Engineer on 16 January, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 24420 of 2008(F)


1. G.SASIDHARAKURUP, PUBLIC WORKS
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION
                       ...       Respondent

2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (P)

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,CIVIL STATION,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.A.RAZZAK

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :16/01/2009

 O R D E R
                          ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                           ---------------------------
                        W.P.(C) No. 24420 of 2008
                       ------------------------------------
                Dated this the 16th day of January, 2009

                                 JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a contractor. He was awarded three different

Government Contracts by the first respondent and Exhibits P2, P3 and

P4 are the contracts. The work has been executed by the petitioner and

the petitioner is relying on Exhibits P5, P6 and P7 completion

certificates. However, payment was not released. Reasons stated in the

counter affidavit filed by the 3rd respondent is that the District

Collector omitted to countersign the agreement of the works executed

between the petitioner and the first respondent.

A reading of counter affidavit shows that the petitioner has

admittedly executed the work and amount claimed is actually due. It is

also stated that if this court issues an order for payment, payment will

be released.

Taking into account the fact that admittedly the work has been

completed and the amount is due, it is ordered that the amount due to

the petitioner for the execution of the work in terms of contract, shall

W.P.(C) No. 24420 /2008
2

be paid to the petitioner ignoring the fact that Collector has not

countersign the agreement for payment ought to be released by the first

respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks

of production of copy of this judgment.

Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the first

respondent for compliance.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE

scm