IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
DATED THEE THE 17″‘ DAY’J€j’F”:3EC’£;§M8EAé”,»«.2V0_Oé’h
BEFORE? 1
THE HONZBLE MR.3US_fi’C:E S_,_/5\B.[‘)”L%–LT_:fv\._J/5\Z FEER
J &é>7£e
T»11sC.CvL_.’r\:O;«;f
5′ ,=«; a;_ _ __x/&%0
REvC3’LlL;;§\’R F:’R4sTvvT.gEE’E”AL?:;No_; OF 2009 (12%)
BETWEEN ;’ V’
1; ~ G VE{\H. N011
YE’L ;§,H§\NKA OLD TC}WN,YELAHANKA
V§3Awr;3ALoRE~e4
AA _2 ” VSMT AELARASU
W/O G VENKATESH
AGED ABOUT 34 YRS
R/A”? f\§.1077/1020/1021,
HOSI5. BEEDLWARD NOJ11
YELAHANKA OLD TOR/’\!{\J
YELAHANKA,313\NGALORE~64
3 SMT RANGANAYAKAMRIA
W/O KSHENATH
AGED ABOUT 55 YRS
R/AT N,1077/1020×1021,
HOSA BEEDLWARD N011
YELAHANKA OLD TOWN
YEL/5\HANKA,BAN{3ALC}REA€>4 . ._
–.,.A–F>l3ELLAi’jdTS~f,
(By Sri: G RAMANA, ADVOCATE) ‘T
AND ;
1 SRI N ‘D:.. CITY cIvTL & SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH~27_,
S”ANG’A’LO<-RE, IN O.S.I\iQ,2259/2084 DATED 2.12.2009,
PEN~F)Ii;$l(3 DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE APPEAL.
THIS MESC. CVL NO. 22750/Q9 COMENG ON FOR
ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT STHE FOLLOWING»