Gandak Command Area Devp.Agenc vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 26 August, 2010

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                                 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.1011 of 2010
                                              IN
                                        CWJC 3962/2010
                                             WITH
                                      I.A. NO. 5559 OF 2010
                                              IN
                                 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.1011 of 2010

                       ===========================================
                   1. GANDAK COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
                       MUZAFFARPUR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY.
                   2. THE SECRETARY, GANDAK COMMAND AREA
                       DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MUZAFFARPUR.
                   3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GANDAK COMMAND
                       AREA DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, SIWAN.
                                         Versus
                    1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE FINANCE
                       SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE , GOVT.
                       OF BIHAR , PATNA.
                   2. BALI RAM PRASAD, S/O SRI DAL SINGAR PRASAD,
                       R/O VILLAGE KARSAUTA,TOLE- BHOJCHAPA, P.S.
                       DARAUNDA,DISTRICT-SIWAN .

                       ===========================================
                      Appearance:
                        For the Appellant : Mr. ISHWARI SINGH
                        For the Respondent: Mr. HARRENDRA PRASAD SINGH
                                            G.A.-6
                                            Dr. KUMAR AMITESH CHANDRA
                     ===========================================
                       CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                   and
                                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN
                       ORAL ORDER

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

03. 26.08.2010 I.A. No. 5559 of 2010.

Though notice on respondent no. 2 is served, he

has not entered appearance.

This application under Section 5 of the Limitation

Act is filed by the appellants for condonation of delay of 33 days

occurred in filing the Letters Patent Appeal.
2

On the facts and in the circumstances of the case,

the delay is condoned.

Interim Application stands disposed of.

At the request of learned advocate appearing on

behalf of the appellant, put up on 30.08.2010.

                                   (R.M. Doshit, CJ.)


S.Sb/-                            (Jyoti Saran, J.)