IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CR. WJC No.453 of 2010
GANESH MISTRY SON OF LATE KAILU MISTRY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PATOI
(DUJURG) P.S. RAFIGANJ, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD
Versus
1. STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME
DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR,
PATNA
3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA ZONE, GOVT. OF BIHAR,
PATNA
4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MAGADH RANGE, GAYA
5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AURANGABAD
6. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ( H.Q) AURANGABAD
7. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE CUM I.O., RAFIGANJ POLICE STATION,
DISTRICT- AURANGABAD
3 17.01.2011
Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the
State.
The grievance of the petitioner is that Rafiganj P.S.
Case No. 146 of 2008 registered for the alleged offences under
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code is not being properly
investigated since up-till-now no police report has been
submitted and the petitioner, who is the informant, a poor
person, is getting constant threats from the accused persons
compelling to compromise the matter.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the
investigation is almost complete and the police report is likely to
be submitted very shortly.
In the above circumstances, no further direction is
called for. However, the respondent no.5 shall look into the
matter so that the police report is submitted in accordance with
law without delay as it has been submitted on behalf of the
State that the police report is likely to be submitted at the
earliest.
The writ application accordingly stands disposed of.
Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)